Rosewall v. Sechelt (District of),
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Gomery |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 20 |
| Date | 10 January 2022 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | S197778; S197779 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety) v Latham,
...and Geraldine Latham (the “Latham Respondents”) special and non-pecuniary damages. The reasons for judgment are indexed as 2022 BCSC 20 (the 3 The Latham Respondents are retirees who purchased houses in Seawatch, a new subdivision overlooking the Sechelt Inlet in an area at ri......
-
1033040 B.C. Ltd v Lumby (Village),
...from circumstances relating to the exercise of statutory authority conferred by the EPA, referring to Rosewall v. Sechelt (District of), 2022 BCSC 20 at para. 79. After I reserved on this application, the court of appeal issued reasons on an appeal from that decision: see British Columbia (......
-
2023 BCSC 402,
...from circumstances relating to the exercise of statutory authority conferred by the EPA, referring to Rosewall v. Sechelt (District of), 2022 BCSC 20 at para. 79. After I reserved on this application, the court of appeal issued reasons on an appeal from that decision: see British Columbia (......
3 cases
-
British Columbia (Minister of Public Safety) v Latham,
...and Geraldine Latham (the “Latham Respondents”) special and non-pecuniary damages. The reasons for judgment are indexed as 2022 BCSC 20 (the 3 The Latham Respondents are retirees who purchased houses in Seawatch, a new subdivision overlooking the Sechelt Inlet in an area at ri......
-
1033040 B.C. Ltd v Lumby (Village),
...from circumstances relating to the exercise of statutory authority conferred by the EPA, referring to Rosewall v. Sechelt (District of), 2022 BCSC 20 at para. 79. After I reserved on this application, the court of appeal issued reasons on an appeal from that decision: see British Columbia (......
-
2023 BCSC 402,
...from circumstances relating to the exercise of statutory authority conferred by the EPA, referring to Rosewall v. Sechelt (District of), 2022 BCSC 20 at para. 79. After I reserved on this application, the court of appeal issued reasons on an appeal from that decision: see British Columbia (......