Rubayi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 74

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 74
Date26 January 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Alajnf v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 151
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 1, 2023
    ...because an ADR or a temporary suspension of removals is in place for that country. See Rubayi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 74; Bawazir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 623; Camacho Valera v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1087; Moore v Canada ......
  • Marafa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 571
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 1, 2018
    ...at paras 32-36; Lauture v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 336 at paras 30-31; Rubayi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 74 at paras 14-25). In reality, an officer who commits this error is confusing the criteria applicable to an H&C application, governed by se......
  • Al-Aswadi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1623
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 25, 2022
    ...at paras 32-36; Lauture v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 336 at paras 30-31; Rubayi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 74 at paras 14-25). In reality, an officer who commits this error is confusing the criteria applicable to an H&C application, governed by&#x......
  • Malave Turmero v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 402
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 23, 2022
    ...(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1409 at paras 34, 36-37; Rubayi v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 74 at paras 22-24]. There is no mention of the ADR in the Officer’s decision. [26] The Applicants assert that the Officer erred in failing to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Alajnf v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 151
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 1, 2023
    ...because an ADR or a temporary suspension of removals is in place for that country. See Rubayi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 74; Bawazir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 623; Camacho Valera v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1087; Moore v Canada ......
  • Marafa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 571
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 1, 2018
    ...at paras 32-36; Lauture v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 336 at paras 30-31; Rubayi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 74 at paras 14-25). In reality, an officer who commits this error is confusing the criteria applicable to an H&C application, governed by se......
  • Al-Aswadi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1623
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 25, 2022
    ...at paras 32-36; Lauture v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 336 at paras 30-31; Rubayi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 74 at paras 14-25). In reality, an officer who commits this error is confusing the criteria applicable to an H&C application, governed by&#x......
  • Malave Turmero v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 402
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 23, 2022
    ...(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1409 at paras 34, 36-37; Rubayi v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 74 at paras 22-24]. There is no mention of the ADR in the Officer’s decision. [26] The Applicants assert that the Officer erred in failing to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT