Rue v. Babyak, [2012] Sask.R. Uned. 161 (FD)

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeSchwann, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW
Citation[2012] Sask.R. Uned. 161 (FD),2012 SKQB 541,[2012] Sask.R. Uned. 161
Date28 December 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...evidence by way of an independently prepared home study is another factor which extends the time required between any interim order 325 2012 SKQB 541 at paras 15–16; see also Sane v Sane, 2015 SKQB 313, citing Guenther v Guenther (1999), 181 Sask R 83 (QB). As to the disinclination of appel......
  • Parenting Arrangements after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 Agosto 2020
    ...necessary before a variation to a temporary order will be granted: Biddle v. Biddle, [2005] O.J. No. 737 (S.C.J.) per Blishen J.269 268 2012 SKQB 541 at paras 15–16; see also Sane v Sane, 2015 SKQB 313, citing Guenther v Guenther (1999), 181 Sask R 83 (QB). As to the disinclination of appel......
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fifth Edition
    • 29 Agosto 2013
    ..., [2004] O.J. No. 907 (S.C.J.) per Sachs J. 220 Travis v Travis , 2011 SKQB 307, citing Stephanson v Schulte , 2000 SKQB 341. 221 2012 SKQB 541 at paras 15–16. As to the disinclination of appellate courts to disturb an interim custody order, see HEK v MLK , 2013 SKCA 14, citing Mantyka v Du......
  • Parenting Arrangements after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • 29 Agosto 2017
    ...v Avitan (1992), 38 RFL (3d) 382 (Ont Gen Div). 283 Travis v Travis , 2011 SKQB 307, citing Stephanson v Schulte , 2000 SKQB 341. 284 2012 SKQB 541 at paras 15–16; see also Sane v Sane , 2015 SKQB 313, citing Guenther v Guenther (1999), 181 Sask R 83 (QB). As to the disinclination of appell......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 cases
  • Nahorniak v. Nahorniak, 2015 SKQB 317
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 8 Octubre 2015
    ...rather than tinkering with existing arrangements. While this is stated in a number of decisions, I refer in particular to Rue v. Babyak , 2012 SKQB 541. At paras 15 and 16 of that decision, Schwann J. stated as follows: 15 As a starting point, this Court's reluctance to vary interim custody......
2 books & journal articles
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...evidence by way of an independently prepared home study is another factor which extends the time required between any interim order 325 2012 SKQB 541 at paras 15–16; see also Sane v Sane, 2015 SKQB 313, citing Guenther v Guenther (1999), 181 Sask R 83 (QB). As to the disinclination of appel......
  • Parenting Arrangements after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 Agosto 2020
    ...necessary before a variation to a temporary order will be granted: Biddle v. Biddle, [2005] O.J. No. 737 (S.C.J.) per Blishen J.269 268 2012 SKQB 541 at paras 15–16; see also Sane v Sane, 2015 SKQB 313, citing Guenther v Guenther (1999), 181 Sask R 83 (QB). As to the disinclination of appel......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT