Ruparell v. J.H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al.,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeLEIPER J.
Citation2020 ONSC 7466
Docket NumberCV-20-00641529-0000
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date07 December 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
15 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 31 ' August 4)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 8, 2023
    ...v. Pecore, 2007 SCC 17, Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, Ruparell v. J. H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al., 2020 ONSC 7466, Alberta v. Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, 2011 SCC 24, Combe v. Combe, [1951] 2 KB 215 (E.W.C.A.), Cowper-Smith v. Morgan, 2017 SCC 61 Mor......
  • Specific Performance: Discretionary Defences and Considerations that Affect Discretion
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...Tahu Property Ltd v Dykstra (2009), 10 NZCPR 734 (HC) at para 12, citing Spry, above note 4. 146 Ruparell v JH Cochrane Investments Inc , 2020 ONSC 7466 at paras 75 and 83, af’d on appeal 2021 ONCA 880. 147 Van v Qureshi , 2013 ONSC 3179, af’d on appeal 2014 ONCA 243. 148 Matila Ltd v Lishe......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...Rude Native Inc v Tyrone T Resto Lounge, 2010 FC 1278................................. 100 Ruparell v JH Cochrane Investments Inc, 2020 ONSC 7466, af’d on appeal, 2021 ONCA 880 .................................................................474 Rutherford v Acton-Adams, [1915] AC 866, 113 ......
  • Eleoff v Adamczyk,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 3, 2024
    ...interest. See United Gulf Developments Ltd. v. Iskandar, 2008 NSCA 71 at para. 14 and Ruparell v. J.H. Cochrane Investments Inc., 2020 ONSC 7466 at paras. 24-25; aff'd by 2021 ONCA 3. Application to this case i. Whether this is an appropriate case for summary judgment 82 I find that this is......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • Eleoff v Adamczyk,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 3, 2024
    ...interest. See United Gulf Developments Ltd. v. Iskandar, 2008 NSCA 71 at para. 14 and Ruparell v. J.H. Cochrane Investments Inc., 2020 ONSC 7466 at paras. 24-25; aff'd by 2021 ONCA 3. Application to this case i. Whether this is an appropriate case for summary judgment 82 I find that this is......
  • 2023 ONCA 525,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • January 1, 2023
    ...accounting to determine what was owed: see, e.g., Prolink, at paras. 41–42; Ruparell v. J. H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al., 2020 ONSC 7466, aff'd 2021 ONCA 27 As noted above, the appellants concede that their submission that Bleta was not unjustly enriched, “stands or......
  • Aiello v Bleta,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 3, 2023
    ...accounting to determine what was owed: see, e.g., Prolink, at paras. 41–42; Ruparell v. J. H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al., 2020 ONSC 7466, aff'd 2021 ONCA 27 As noted above, the appellants concede that their submission that Bleta was not unjustly enriched, “stands or......
  • Aiello et al. v. Bleta et al.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 31, 2022
    ...of the agreement”: at para. 41. [216]       In Ruparell v. J. H. Cochrane Investments Inc., et al., 2020 ONSC 7466, aff’d 2021 ONCA 880,) the Court enforced an oral agreement to buy shares in a Volkswagen dealership based on discussions, a term sh......
  • Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 31 ' August 4)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 8, 2023
    ...v. Pecore, 2007 SCC 17, Prolink Broker Network Inc. v. Jaitley, 2013 ONSC 4497, Ruparell v. J. H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al., 2020 ONSC 7466, Alberta v. Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, 2011 SCC 24, Combe v. Combe, [1951] 2 KB 215 (E.W.C.A.), Cowper-Smith v. Morgan, 2017 SCC 61 Mor......
  • How Do I Know If I Formed A Contract?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 13, 2023
    ...2022 ONSC 1555 at para 34. 7 S.O. 2000, c. 17. 8 Section 11(1). 9 2015 BCCA 144. 10 Ruparell v J.H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al., 2020 ONSC 7466. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your speci......
  • Whether Electronic Communication Forms A Legally Binding Contract?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 24, 2022
    ...reached by way of the emails, without the need for the formal written agreement. Ruparell v. J.H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al., 2020 ONSC 7466 Ruparell was a more recent Ontario Superior Court decision which contemplated similar issues. The parties signed a non-binding letter of intent ......
  • A 20/20 Perspective On COVID-19's Impact On Contracts
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 9, 2021
    ...pandemic prevented parties from taking reasonable steps to fulfil those obligations. In Ruparell v J.H. Cochrane Investments Inc. et al, 2020 ONSC 7466, the Court considered whether COVID-19 was an intervening event in regard to a 'best efforts' In the spring of 2020, the parties were in ne......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...Rude Native Inc v Tyrone T Resto Lounge, 2010 FC 1278................................. 100 Ruparell v JH Cochrane Investments Inc, 2020 ONSC 7466, af’d on appeal, 2021 ONCA 880 .................................................................474 Rutherford v Acton-Adams, [1915] AC 866, 113 ......
  • Specific Performance: Discretionary Defences and Considerations that Affect Discretion
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...Tahu Property Ltd v Dykstra (2009), 10 NZCPR 734 (HC) at para 12, citing Spry, above note 4. 146 Ruparell v JH Cochrane Investments Inc , 2020 ONSC 7466 at paras 75 and 83, af’d on appeal 2021 ONCA 880. 147 Van v Qureshi , 2013 ONSC 3179, af’d on appeal 2014 ONCA 243. 148 Matila Ltd v Lishe......