S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2020 BCSC 468

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeBasran
Citation2020 BCSC 468
Docket NumberE120604
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date30 March 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Split and Shared Parenting Time Arrangements
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...see BPE v AE, 2016 BCCA 335; see also KMR v IWR, 2020 ABQB 77; Russell v Ullett Russell, 2021 ABQB 769 at paras 17–25; SRM v NGTM, 2020 BCSC 468; KAC v JDEC, 2020 BCSC Prime v Prime, 2021 SKQB 130. 103 BPE v AE, 2016 BCCA 335. 104 See Gottinger v Runge, 2018 SKQB 343 at para 20. 105 Adams v......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...SRM v NGTM, 2020 BCSC 468.................................................................................................................................335 SS v DS, 2010 NSCA 74......................................................................................................................
  • C.M.L. v. A.J.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 31 Agosto 2022
    ...authority on matters where the parents cannot agree. Legal Principles [39]       In S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2020 BCSC 468, at paras. 149-153, Justice Basran helpfully summarized the applicable legal principles with respect to parenting [149] The parties a......
  • SSG v SKG,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 Febrero 2022
    ...for a family at this general level of affluence, with two children and shared parenting. [321]     In SRM v NGTM, 2020 BCSC 468, the payor parent earned an amount comparable to the father in this case. The court awarded $16,000 per month in child support, though notably ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • C.M.L. v. A.J.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 31 Agosto 2022
    ...authority on matters where the parents cannot agree. Legal Principles [39]       In S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2020 BCSC 468, at paras. 149-153, Justice Basran helpfully summarized the applicable legal principles with respect to parenting [149] The parties a......
  • SSG v SKG,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 Febrero 2022
    ...for a family at this general level of affluence, with two children and shared parenting. [321]     In SRM v NGTM, 2020 BCSC 468, the payor parent earned an amount comparable to the father in this case. The court awarded $16,000 per month in child support, though notably ......
  • 2023 BCSC 587,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...(l) exercising any other responsibilities reasonably necessary to nurture the child's development. 48 In S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2020 BCSC 468, Justice Basran set out the considerations applicable to a determination of decision-making authority: 151 Division 2 of Part 4 of the FLA sets out......
  • B.D.D. v G.T.S.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 14 Abril 2023
    ...(l) exercising any other responsibilities reasonably necessary to nurture the child's development. 48 In S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2020 BCSC 468, Justice Basran set out the considerations applicable to a determination of decision-making authority: 151 Division 2 of Part 4 of the FLA sets out......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...SRM v NGTM, 2020 BCSC 468.................................................................................................................................335 SS v DS, 2010 NSCA 74......................................................................................................................
  • Split and Shared Parenting Time Arrangements
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...see BPE v AE, 2016 BCCA 335; see also KMR v IWR, 2020 ABQB 77; Russell v Ullett Russell, 2021 ABQB 769 at paras 17–25; SRM v NGTM, 2020 BCSC 468; KAC v JDEC, 2020 BCSC Prime v Prime, 2021 SKQB 130. 103 BPE v AE, 2016 BCCA 335. 104 See Gottinger v Runge, 2018 SKQB 343 at para 20. 105 Adams v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT