Saccone v. Fandrakis, [2002] B.C.T.C. 73 (SC)

JudgeCatliff, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 15, 2002
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2002] B.C.T.C. 73 (SC);2002 BCSC 73

Saccone v. Fandrakis, [2002] B.C.T.C. 73 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2002] B.C.T.C. TBEd. FE.106

Sean Saccone (plaintiff) v. Stefanos Petros Fandrakis (defendant)

(B983160; 2002 BCSC 73)

Indexed As: Saccone v. Fandrakis

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Catliff, J.

February 5, 2002.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Torts - Topic 13

Negligence - Standard of care - Rescues - See paragraphs 1 to 18.

Torts - Topic 60

Negligence - Causation - Foreseeability - See paragraphs 1 to 18.

Torts - Topic 61

Negligence - Causation - Causal connection - See paragraphs 1 to 18.

Torts - Topic 77

Negligence - Duty of Care - Relationship required to raise duty of care - See paragraphs 1 to 18.

Cases Noticed:

Anns v. Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 5].

Cooper v. Registrar of Mortgage Brokers (B.C.) et al. (2001), 277 N.R. 113; 160 B.C.A.C. 268; 261 W.A.C. 268 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 5].

Schlink v. Blackburn et al. (1993), 39 B.C.A.C. 1; 64 W.A.C. 1; 87 B.C.L.R.(2d) 129 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].

Prescott (Town) v. Connell (1893), 22 S.C.R. 147, refd to. [para. 9].

Hutterly v. Imperial Oil Ltd. and Caler (1956), 3 D.L.R.(2d) 719 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 10].

Rexter v. Starin (1878), 73 N.Y. 601, refd to. [para. 15].

Counsel:

Lawrence E. Pierce, for the plaintiff;

J. Derek James, for the defendant.

This case was heard on January 15, 2002, before Catliff, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on February 5, 2002.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Smith v. Tucker, 2007 BCSC 489
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 11 Abril 2007
    ...there was a risk of danger both to the driver of the car and of the car exploding); Saccone v. Fandrakis (2002), 11 C.C.L.T. (3d) 151, 2002 BCSC 73 (denying compensation to the plaintiff, who sought to protect only his economic interests by running to the scene of an accident, in a situatio......
1 cases
  • Smith v. Tucker, 2007 BCSC 489
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 11 Abril 2007
    ...there was a risk of danger both to the driver of the car and of the car exploding); Saccone v. Fandrakis (2002), 11 C.C.L.T. (3d) 151, 2002 BCSC 73 (denying compensation to the plaintiff, who sought to protect only his economic interests by running to the scene of an accident, in a situatio......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT