Sahyoun v. Ho et al.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Voith, J. |
| Citation | [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 392,2015 BCSC 392,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 392 (SC) |
| Date | 12 March 2015 |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,COURTS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
81 practice notes
-
British Columbia v. Apotex Inc.
...claims and issues before the court and would involve needless expense and delay: Simon at para. 52 citing Sahyoun (Committee of) v. Ho, 2015 BCSC 392, aff’d 2017 BCCA 96, leave to appeal ref’d [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 37581 [56] In Moses v. Lower Nicola Indian Band, 2015 BCCA 61 at para. 45, Jus......
-
Banni v Coast Foundation Society (1974) (Coast Mental Health)
...to be stayed or dismissed and may order the costs of the application to be paid as special costs. 70 As stated in Sahyoun v. Ho, 2015 BCSC 392 at para. 57: [57] The test on an application to strike an action under R. 9–5(1)(a), on the basis the pleadings do not disclose a cause of action, i......
-
Larouche v Pure Gold Mining Inc.
...of justice: Mercantile Office Systems Private Limited v. Worldwide Warranty Life Services Inc., 2021 BCCA 362 at para. 58; Sahyoun v. Ho, 2015 BCSC 392 at paras. 57–63, aff'd 2015 BCCA 235; Johnston v. Rykon Construction Management Ltd., 2020 BCSC 572 at paras. 20–23. These principles apply......
-
R.J.R. v. P.M.R.
...the claim must be evaluated. If they are not pleaded, the exercise cannot be properly conducted. [Emphasis added.] [27] In Sahyoun v. Ho, 2015 BCSC 392, Voith J. summarized the test for striking pleadings under Rule 9-5(1). After stating the test concerning Rule 9-5(1)(a), Voith J. [58] The......
Get Started for Free
43 cases
-
British Columbia v. Apotex Inc.
...claims and issues before the court and would involve needless expense and delay: Simon at para. 52 citing Sahyoun (Committee of) v. Ho, 2015 BCSC 392, aff’d 2017 BCCA 96, leave to appeal ref’d [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 37581 [56]        In Moses v.......
-
Grosz v. Royal Trust Corporation Of Canada
...properly address all of the facts and the elements of the causes of action. Analysis [97] As Justice Voith recognized in Sahyoun v. Ho, 2015 BCSC 392 at paras. 61–64, while R. 9-5(1)(a) to (d) address different concerns, there is also significant overlap among them. In the case of pleadings......
-
Skyllar v. The University of British Columbia
...material facts supporting each cause of action, the relief claimed, and the legal basis for the relief sought: Sahyoun v. Ho, 2015 BCSC 392 at [62]        I have also considered whether I should exercise my discretion to grant leave to amend the ......
-
R.J.R. v. P.M.R.
...pleaded, the exercise cannot be properly conducted. [Emphasis added.] [27]        In Sahyoun v. Ho, 2015 BCSC 392, Voith J. summarized the test for striking pleadings under Rule 9-5(1). After stating the test concerning Rule 9-5(1)(a), Voith J. [58] &......
Get Started for Free
