Salmon v. Gurney et al., (1997) 153 Sask.R. 1 (QB)
Judge | Archambault, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Case Date | January 30, 1997 |
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Citations | (1997), 153 Sask.R. 1 (QB) |
Salmon v. Gurney (1997), 153 Sask.R. 1 (QB)
MLB headnote and full text
Jodie Salmon (plaintiff) v. Deanna Gurney, Laurie Ruhr and Patrick Ruhr (defendants)
(1992 Q.B. No. 758)
Indexed As: Salmon v. Gurney et al.
Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench
Judicial Centre of Regina
Archambault, J.
January 30, 1997.
Summary:
The plaintiff sued the defendants for damages for injuries sustained while she was a passenger in a motor vehicle operated by the defendant Gurney which was involved in an accident. Gurney admitted liability but disputed quantum.
The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench assessed damages accordingly. The action against the two other defendants was dismissed where no evidence was presented at trial to establish their liability.
Damage Awards - Topic 179
Injury and death - Neck injuries - Soft tissue injuries - The 23 year old female plaintiff suffered a neck and shoulder muscle type injury in a motor vehicle accident - She was a waitress with grade 11 education - She suffered continuing flare ups of pain, restriction in mobility and headaches six years after the accident - During the flare ups she could not do house work or rigorous activities - She could not cope with full-time employment - The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench considered her to be moderately disabled and assessed $48,000 nonpecuniary general damages, but reduced the award by 5% for failure to mitigate - See paragraphs 33 to 48.
Damage Awards - Topic 182
Injury and death - Neck injuries - Muscle injuries - [See Damage Awards - Topic 179 ].
Damages - Topic 1565
General damages - For personal injury - Deductions - Unclaimed insurance benefits - The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident - The defendant argued that the plaintiff failed to apply for Part II insurance benefits to which she was entitled for her disability and as these benefits were forfeited, they should be deducted from the damages awarded (Automobile Accident Insurance Act, s. 79) - The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench rejected the defendant's argument where the defendant failed to show that the defendant was qualified and authorized by law to drive a motor vehicle as required by s. 79 - See paragraphs 82 to 91.
Cases Noticed:
Janiak v. Ippolito, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 146; 57 N.R. 241; 9 O.A.C. 1; 16 D.L.R.(4th) 1; 31 C.C.L.T. 113, refd to. [para. 39].
Pascoe v. Ledwich (1979), 2 Man.R.(2d) 71 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 42].
Bunce v. Flick et al., [1991] 5 W.W.R. 623; 93 Sask.R. 53; 4 W.A.C. 53 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 43].
Ede v. Junek and Hart (1990), 87 Sask.R. 126 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 44].
Bouchard v. Kirstein (1983), 25 Sask.R. 79 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 44].
Bookhalter v. Hodel and Hodel (1985), 42 Sask.R. 305 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 44].
Pitre v. Wolstenholma (1995), 132 Sask.R. 183 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 44].
Peecock v. Altrogge (1995), 131 Sask.R. 241; 95 W.A.C. 241 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 46].
Watkins v. Olafson et al., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 750; 100 N.R. 161; 61 Man.R.(2d) 81; [1989] 6 W.W.R. 481; 61 D.L.R.(4th) 577; 39 B.C.L.R.(2d) 294; 50 C.C.L.T. 101, refd to. [para. 78].
Fobel v. Dean and MacDonald (1991), 93 Sask.R. 121; 4 W.A.C. 121 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 78].
Grimard v. Berry et al. (1992), 102 Sask.R. 137 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 78].
Frehlick v. McLenehan (1980), 3 Sask.R. 340 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 85].
Herbert v. Misuga (1994), 116 Sask.R. 292; 59 W.A.C. 292 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 85].
Statutes Noticed:
Automobile Accident Insurance Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. A-35, sect. 65 [para. 91]; sect. 79 [para. 84].
Counsel:
S.G. Segal, for the plaintiff;
R.G. Gates, for the defendants.
This action was heard before Archambault, J., of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial Centre of Regina, who delivered the following judgment on January 30, 1997.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Park v. Zealandia B.P.O. Elks Inc. et al., 2001 SKQB 299
...v. Wickware et al. (1999), 119 B.C.A.C. 32; 194 W.A.C. 32; 169 D.L.R.(4th) 661 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 105]. Salmon v. Gurney et al. (1997), 153 Sask.R. 1 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Ratych v. Bloomer, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 940; 107 N.R. 335; 39 O.A.C. 103; 69 D.L.R.(4th) 25; 30 C.C.E.L. 161; 3 C.C.L......
-
Campbell-MacIsaac et al. v. Deveaux et al., 2003 NSSC 111
...436 A.P.R. 102 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 162]. Pascoe v. Ledwich (1979), 2 Man.R.(2d) 71 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 168]. Salmon v. Gurney (1997), 153 Sask.R. 1 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Janiak v. Ippolito, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 146; 57 N.R. 241; 9 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 180]. Boarelli v. Flannigan (......
-
HERBERT v. AUTO CONNECTION (1993) Ltd., 2017 SKQB 110
...with the defendants, who must establish on a balance of probabilities that Mr. Herbert has not acted reasonably. [244] Salmon v Gurney (1997), 153 Sask R 1 (Sask QB) [Salmon] addresses the situation this 38 With respect to pre-trial employment, there are causes other than her motor vehicle ......
-
Salmon v. Gurney et al., (1999) 177 Sask.R. 151 (CA)
...involved in an accident. Gurney admitted liability but disputed quantum. The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench, in a decision reported 153 Sask.R. 1, assessed damages accordingly. The action against the two other defendants was dismissed where no evidence was presented at trial to establi......
-
Park v. Zealandia B.P.O. Elks Inc. et al., 2001 SKQB 299
...v. Wickware et al. (1999), 119 B.C.A.C. 32; 194 W.A.C. 32; 169 D.L.R.(4th) 661 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 105]. Salmon v. Gurney et al. (1997), 153 Sask.R. 1 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Ratych v. Bloomer, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 940; 107 N.R. 335; 39 O.A.C. 103; 69 D.L.R.(4th) 25; 30 C.C.E.L. 161; 3 C.C.L......
-
Campbell-MacIsaac et al. v. Deveaux et al., 2003 NSSC 111
...436 A.P.R. 102 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 162]. Pascoe v. Ledwich (1979), 2 Man.R.(2d) 71 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 168]. Salmon v. Gurney (1997), 153 Sask.R. 1 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Janiak v. Ippolito, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 146; 57 N.R. 241; 9 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 180]. Boarelli v. Flannigan (......
-
HERBERT v. AUTO CONNECTION (1993) Ltd., 2017 SKQB 110
...with the defendants, who must establish on a balance of probabilities that Mr. Herbert has not acted reasonably. [244] Salmon v Gurney (1997), 153 Sask R 1 (Sask QB) [Salmon] addresses the situation this 38 With respect to pre-trial employment, there are causes other than her motor vehicle ......
-
Salmon v. Gurney et al., (1999) 177 Sask.R. 151 (CA)
...involved in an accident. Gurney admitted liability but disputed quantum. The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench, in a decision reported 153 Sask.R. 1, assessed damages accordingly. The action against the two other defendants was dismissed where no evidence was presented at trial to establi......