SAM v MPM, 2020 ABQB 462

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice M. J. Lema
Docket Number4803 189374
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date12 August 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...Section F, above in this chapter. Compare Bruno v Keinick, 2012 NSSC 336; Leelaratna v Leelaratna, 2018 ONSC 5983. 428 See SAM v MPM, 2020 ABQB 462; CJJ v AJ, 2016 BCSC 676; MANR v DJS, 2018 BCSC 2136; RA v MPB, 2021 NSSC 102; Leelaratna v Leelaratna, 2018 ONSC 5983; Bouchard v Sgovio, 2021......
  • KDH v BTH,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 15, 2021
    ...his material contributions to that conflict, to the children’s reluctance to see him. [102]     In SAM v MPM, 2020 ABQB 462, I considered, and rejected, a father’s “mother alienating children” argument where parental conflict was a major aggra......
  • Manegre v Manegre,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 7, 2021
    ...his mother since September 2018 but has recently begun having contact with his father. Counsel for the applicant relies on SAM v MPM, 2020 ABQB 462 at para 4 to support that a residential shift is a material change in Divorce Act (R.S.C., 1985, c.3 (2nd Supp.)) Best interests of the child 1......
2 cases
  • KDH v BTH,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 15, 2021
    ...his material contributions to that conflict, to the children’s reluctance to see him. [102]     In SAM v MPM, 2020 ABQB 462, I considered, and rejected, a father’s “mother alienating children” argument where parental conflict was a major aggra......
  • Manegre v Manegre,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 7, 2021
    ...his mother since September 2018 but has recently begun having contact with his father. Counsel for the applicant relies on SAM v MPM, 2020 ABQB 462 at para 4 to support that a residential shift is a material change in Divorce Act (R.S.C., 1985, c.3 (2nd Supp.)) Best interests of the child 1......
1 books & journal articles
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...Section F, above in this chapter. Compare Bruno v Keinick, 2012 NSSC 336; Leelaratna v Leelaratna, 2018 ONSC 5983. 428 See SAM v MPM, 2020 ABQB 462; CJJ v AJ, 2016 BCSC 676; MANR v DJS, 2018 BCSC 2136; RA v MPB, 2021 NSSC 102; Leelaratna v Leelaratna, 2018 ONSC 5983; Bouchard v Sgovio, 2021......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT