Sammut v. Doheny, 2019 ONCA 693

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePaciocco, Harvison Young and Zarnett JJ.A.
Citation2019 ONCA 693
Date05 September 2019
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC65910
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 3 – 6 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 11, 2019
    ...Watto v. Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council, 2019 ONCA 683 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Appeals, Factum Sammut v. Doheny, 2019 ONCA 693 Keywords: Real Property, Adverse Possession Makwana v. Bishnu, 2019 ONCA 695 Keywords: Family Law, Spousal Support, Child Support, Fraudule......
  • McKay v. Vautour,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • January 10, 2020
    ...While fences can provide powerful evidence giving rise to such an inference, such a presumption is not mandatory: Sammut v. Doheny, 2019 ONCA 693, at para. [16] In this case, the evidence concerning the purpose and treatment of the paddock fence was at best ambiguous. While Ms. Deckers test......
1 cases
  • McKay v. Vautour, 2020 ONCA 16
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • January 10, 2020
    ...While fences can provide powerful evidence giving rise to such an inference, such a presumption is not mandatory: Sammut v. Doheny, 2019 ONCA 693, at para. [16] In this case, the evidence concerning the purpose and treatment of the paddock fence was at best ambiguous. While Ms. Deckers test......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 3 – 6 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 11, 2019
    ...Watto v. Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council, 2019 ONCA 683 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Appeals, Factum Sammut v. Doheny, 2019 ONCA 693 Keywords: Real Property, Adverse Possession Makwana v. Bishnu, 2019 ONCA 695 Keywords: Family Law, Spousal Support, Child Support, Fraudule......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT