Sandhu v. Sandhu, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1183

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeFisher, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE,FAMILY LAW
Citation[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1183,2012 BCSC 1183,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1183 (SC)
Date07 August 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 practice notes
  • Dorey v. Havens, 2017 BCSC 2206
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 1, 2017
    ...appear to have gone both ways in this regard: see C.L.M. v. M.J.S., 2017 BCSC 1517; Olsen v. Chinniah, 2012 BCSC 624 ; Sandhu v. Sandhu, 2012 BCSC 1183; Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2011 ONSC 946; British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Houle (1994), 1 B.C.L.R. (3d) 215 (S.C.) [in Chambers]; MacKen......
  • Dorey v. Havens, 2019 BCCA 47
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 6, 2019
    ...B. (W.S.), 2004 BCSC 837; S.L.M. v. D.R.M., 2003 BCSC 1094 [Manolescu]; Cain v. Hodgson, 2013 BCSC 310 (in Chambers); Sandhu v. Sandhu, 2012 BCSC 1183. In Bankruptcy of Patrick Lees, 2002 BCSC 570 [Re Lees], Mr. Justice Wilson stated the point [17] It is beyond dispute that costs incurred i......
  • McLachlan v. McLachlan, [2013] B.C.T.C. TBEd. 1733
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 23, 2013
    ...to an entered order is sought because of events that occurred after the order was entered. [98] The recent case of Sandhu v. Sandhu , 2012 BCSC 1183 [ Sandhu ] is helpful in this regard. There, the trial judge made an order for costs in favour of the respondent against the claimant, and in ......
  • D.M.B. v. D.W.A.L., 2019 BCSC 4
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 3, 2019
    ...and now received submissions from both parties on the issue. [38]        In Sandhu v. Sandhu, 2012 BCSC 1183, Justice Fisher concluded that the Court hearing the trial has jurisdiction to apportion costs even after an order has been entered if a party liab......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Dorey v. Havens, 2017 BCSC 2206
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 1, 2017
    ...appear to have gone both ways in this regard: see C.L.M. v. M.J.S., 2017 BCSC 1517; Olsen v. Chinniah, 2012 BCSC 624 ; Sandhu v. Sandhu, 2012 BCSC 1183; Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2011 ONSC 946; British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Houle (1994), 1 B.C.L.R. (3d) 215 (S.C.) [in Chambers]; MacKen......
  • Dorey v. Havens, 2019 BCCA 47
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 6, 2019
    ...B. (W.S.), 2004 BCSC 837; S.L.M. v. D.R.M., 2003 BCSC 1094 [Manolescu]; Cain v. Hodgson, 2013 BCSC 310 (in Chambers); Sandhu v. Sandhu, 2012 BCSC 1183. In Bankruptcy of Patrick Lees, 2002 BCSC 570 [Re Lees], Mr. Justice Wilson stated the point [17] It is beyond dispute that costs incurred i......
  • McLachlan v. McLachlan, [2013] B.C.T.C. TBEd. 1733
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 23, 2013
    ...to an entered order is sought because of events that occurred after the order was entered. [98] The recent case of Sandhu v. Sandhu , 2012 BCSC 1183 [ Sandhu ] is helpful in this regard. There, the trial judge made an order for costs in favour of the respondent against the claimant, and in ......
  • D.M.B. v. D.W.A.L., 2019 BCSC 4
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 3, 2019
    ...and now received submissions from both parties on the issue. [38]        In Sandhu v. Sandhu, 2012 BCSC 1183, Justice Fisher concluded that the Court hearing the trial has jurisdiction to apportion costs even after an order has been entered if a party liab......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT