Sandiford et al. v. 2104587 Ontario Inc. et al.

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgePattillo, J.
Citation[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 5825 (SC),2012 ONSC 5825,[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 5825
Date05 December 2012
Subject MatterCOMPANY LAW,CONTRACTS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1 practice notes
  • JBRO Holdings Inc. v Dynasty Power Inc.
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 14, 2025
    ...years or more. None of that evidence qualifies as surrounding circumstances. 54 The Defendants rely on Sandiford v 21045887 Ontario Inc, 2012 ONSC 5825, in which the court ruled that the singular word “Shareholder” in a shotgun clause should be interpreted to allow the shotgun to be trigger......
2 cases
  • Leavens v. Schwartz
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 5, 2023
    ...requiring a mini-trial, however. He scheduled that for a one day hearing within a matter of weeks. His decision on the main application (2012 ONSC 5825) was rendered following that [65] I would also emphasize again that the buy/sell provision is meant to allow an expeditious, relatively ine......
  • JBRO Holdings Inc v. Dynasty Power Inc
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 14, 2025
    ...as surrounding circumstances. [54]        The Defendants rely on Sandiford v 21045887 Ontario Inc, 2012 ONSC 5825, in which the court ruled that the singular word “Shareholder” in a shotgun clause should be interpreted to allow the shotgun to be triggered ......