Sanmugalingam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 200
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Kane, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,PRACTICE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
| Citation | 2016 FC 200,[2016] F.T.R. Uned. 61 (FC),[2016] F.T.R. Uned. 61 |
| Date | 15 February 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Fermin Mora v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 521
...to draw a negative inference about credibility, in light of all of the evidence (Sanmugalingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 200 at para 81). [37] The Court also acknowledges that the RAD did not err in the explanations it gave with regard to the divorce papers. The......
-
Al-Hafidhi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 315
...Nurses’ Union v Newfoundland and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62. [28] Sanmugalingam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 200 per Kane J outlines the law in connection with how the RAD should approach credibility findings on appeal from an RPD decision: [34] With respect t......
-
Ketchen v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 116 (FC)
...facts ( Tchangoue v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2016 FC 334 at para 12 ; Sanmugalingam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2016 FC 200 at para 36). It is trite law that the Court must therefore take a deferential approach and resist imposing its own analysis: if the decision......
-
Rehman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 783
...from the Applicant with regard to credibility concerns with the new evidence, citing Sanmugalingam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2016 FC 200 [Sanmugalingam] at para 55, 60, 71 and Vicente v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 537, at paras 12-18. Analysis [29] In my view,......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Fermin Mora v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 521
...to draw a negative inference about credibility, in light of all of the evidence (Sanmugalingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 200 at para 81). [37] The Court also acknowledges that the RAD did not err in the explanations it gave with regard to the divorce papers. The......
-
Al-Hafidhi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 315
...Nurses’ Union v Newfoundland and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62. [28] Sanmugalingam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 200 per Kane J outlines the law in connection with how the RAD should approach credibility findings on appeal from an RPD decision: [34] With respect t......
-
Ketchen v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 116 (FC)
...facts ( Tchangoue v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2016 FC 334 at para 12 ; Sanmugalingam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2016 FC 200 at para 36). It is trite law that the Court must therefore take a deferential approach and resist imposing its own analysis: if the decision......
-
Rehman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 783
...from the Applicant with regard to credibility concerns with the new evidence, citing Sanmugalingam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2016 FC 200 [Sanmugalingam] at para 55, 60, 71 and Vicente v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 537, at paras 12-18. Analysis [29] In my view,......
Request a trial to view additional results