Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd., [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 807 (FC)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Snider, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Date | 06 November 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 practice notes
-
Eurocopter v. Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Ltd., (2012) 415 F.T.R. 29 (FC)
...307 F.T.R. 153 ; 2006 FC 1403 , refd to. [para. 20]. Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd., [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 807 ; 2009 FC 1139, refd to. [para. 22]. Adir v. Apotex Inc. - see Laboratoires Servier et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al. Laboratoires Servier et al. v. Apotex Inc. et ......
-
Allergan Inc. v. Sandoz Canada Inc., 2021 FC 186
...level of costs in this Court is the mid-point of Column III in Tariff B: Rule 407; Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc v Novopharm Limited, 2009 FC 1139 at para 4 [Sanofi-Novopharm FC], aff’d 2012 FCA 265; Apotex v Sanofi-Aventis, 2012 FC 318 at para 5 [Apotex v Sanofi-Aventis]; Dennis v Canad......
-
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. Apotex Inc. et al., (2013) 444 F.T.R. 237 (FC)
...of Column III" - See paragraphs 3 to 8. Cases Noticed: Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd., [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 807 ; 2009 FC 1139, refd to. [para. 3]. Novopharm Ltd. v. Eli Lilly & Co., [2010] F.T.R. Uned. 896 ; 2010 FC 1154 , refd to. [para. 3]. Merck & Co. et a......
-
Pharmascience Inc. v. Teva Canada, 2022 FCA 207
...accept Pharmascience’s submission that Teva’s proposals could not be considered, citing Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. v. Novopharm Limited, 2009 FC 1139, aff’d 2012 FCA 265 [Sanofi/Novopharm]. Given “Teva’s proposals to settle”, the Federal Court said that an order that each party bear its own......
Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
-
Eurocopter v. Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Ltd., (2012) 415 F.T.R. 29 (FC)
...307 F.T.R. 153 ; 2006 FC 1403 , refd to. [para. 20]. Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd., [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 807 ; 2009 FC 1139, refd to. [para. 22]. Adir v. Apotex Inc. - see Laboratoires Servier et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al. Laboratoires Servier et al. v. Apotex Inc. et ......
-
Allergan Inc. v. Sandoz Canada Inc., 2021 FC 186
...level of costs in this Court is the mid-point of Column III in Tariff B: Rule 407; Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc v Novopharm Limited, 2009 FC 1139 at para 4 [Sanofi-Novopharm FC], aff’d 2012 FCA 265; Apotex v Sanofi-Aventis, 2012 FC 318 at para 5 [Apotex v Sanofi-Aventis]; Dennis v Canad......
-
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. Apotex Inc. et al., (2013) 444 F.T.R. 237 (FC)
...of Column III" - See paragraphs 3 to 8. Cases Noticed: Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd., [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 807 ; 2009 FC 1139, refd to. [para. 3]. Novopharm Ltd. v. Eli Lilly & Co., [2010] F.T.R. Uned. 896 ; 2010 FC 1154 , refd to. [para. 3]. Merck & Co. et a......
-
Pharmascience Inc. v. Teva Canada, 2022 FCA 207
...accept Pharmascience’s submission that Teva’s proposals could not be considered, citing Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. v. Novopharm Limited, 2009 FC 1139, aff’d 2012 FCA 265 [Sanofi/Novopharm]. Given “Teva’s proposals to settle”, the Federal Court said that an order that each party bear its own......
Request a trial to view additional results