Sarfraz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1578
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 1578 |
| Date | 10 December 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Begum v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 162
...by the Respondent explaining their intent among other things. The Applicants rely on Sarfraz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1578 [Sarfraz], in which Justice Fuhrer reviewed the RIAS for provincial nominee program, whose conclusions I respectfully adopt in this case: [22] In......
-
Dhaliwal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 666
...given the nature of the proposed position. [Emphasis added.] [23] Mr. Dhaliwal relies on Sarfraz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1578 [Sarfraz] in support of his submission that the Officer should defer to the Program, which requires the CLB 4 level. [24] In Sarfraz at para ......
-
Yang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 954
...reasons why granting the WP would not amount to a significant benefit to Canada (Sarfraz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1578 at para 22; Shang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 633 at paras 62, 68-69 [19] Secondly, the Officer reasonably found that the Applica......
-
Bano v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 568
...(Begum at paras 29-30). As the Court notes in Begum at paragraph 18, citing Sarfraz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1578 (CanLII) at paragraph 22, an Officer’s decision to deviate from a provincial nomination must be justified in its reasons: [22] In essenc......
4 cases
-
Begum v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 162
...by the Respondent explaining their intent among other things. The Applicants rely on Sarfraz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1578 [Sarfraz], in which Justice Fuhrer reviewed the RIAS for provincial nominee program, whose conclusions I respectfully adopt in this case: [22] In......
-
Dhaliwal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 666
...given the nature of the proposed position. [Emphasis added.] [23] Mr. Dhaliwal relies on Sarfraz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1578 [Sarfraz] in support of his submission that the Officer should defer to the Program, which requires the CLB 4 level. [24] In Sarfraz at para ......
-
Yang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 954
...reasons why granting the WP would not amount to a significant benefit to Canada (Sarfraz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1578 at para 22; Shang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 633 at paras 62, 68-69 [19] Secondly, the Officer reasonably found that the Applica......
-
Bano v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 568
...(Begum at paras 29-30). As the Court notes in Begum at paragraph 18, citing Sarfraz v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1578 (CanLII) at paragraph 22, an Officer’s decision to deviate from a provincial nomination must be justified in its reasons: [22] In essenc......