Sargsyan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 173
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Noël, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,TORTS,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,LIMITATION OF ACTIONS |
| Date | 17 March 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Febrillet Lorenzo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 925
...for example Tovar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 598 at paras 30, 33–34; Sargsyan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 333 at para 15; Herman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 629 at para 29). However, in my view, an error arises in this matter from......
-
Okpanachi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 212
...to gender: Pozos Martinez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 31 at para 22; Sargsyan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 333 at para 15; Tovar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 598 at paras 30-34; Nsimba v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC ......
-
Taqadees et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1072
...two-part test for the viability of an IFA was recently expressed in Sargsyan v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 333 [Sargsyan], at para 12, as [12] The two-prong test applicable in an IFA analysis is: 1. The RPD must be satisfied, on a balance of probabilities, that......
-
Adedokun v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 510
...and Thirunavukkarasu, above, was recently restated by this Court in Sargsyan v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 333 at paragraph 1. The RPD must be satisfied, on a balance of probabilities, that there is no serious possibility of the Applicant being persecuted in th......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Febrillet Lorenzo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 925
...for example Tovar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 598 at paras 30, 33–34; Sargsyan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 333 at para 15; Herman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 629 at para 29). However, in my view, an error arises in this matter from......
-
Okpanachi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 212
...to gender: Pozos Martinez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 31 at para 22; Sargsyan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 333 at para 15; Tovar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 598 at paras 30-34; Nsimba v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC ......
-
Taqadees et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1072
...two-part test for the viability of an IFA was recently expressed in Sargsyan v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 333 [Sargsyan], at para 12, as [12] The two-prong test applicable in an IFA analysis is: 1. The RPD must be satisfied, on a balance of probabilities, that......
-
Adedokun v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 510
...and Thirunavukkarasu, above, was recently restated by this Court in Sargsyan v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 333 at paragraph 1. The RPD must be satisfied, on a balance of probabilities, that there is no serious possibility of the Applicant being persecuted in th......
Request a trial to view additional results