Sataur v. Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | Laskin, Miller and Paciocco JJ.A. |
Docket Number | C64000 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
Date | 22 December 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 17, 2023 ' April 21, 2023)
...2008 ONCA 506, ADGA Systems International Ltd. v. Valcom Ltd. (1999), 43 O.R. (3d) 101 (C.A.), Sataur v. Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017, Northbridge General Insurance Corp. v. Ashcroft Homes-Capital Hill Inc., 2021 ONSC 1684, Aviva Insurance v. Cunningham et al., 2022 ONSC 633......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (June 1 – 5, 2020)
...the employee of a corporate employer for conduct carried out in the usual course of employment: Sataur v. Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017, Rule 25.06(1) requires a statement of claim to contain a concise statement of the material facts on which the party relies for its claim. E......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 1 ' 5, 2020)
...the employee of a corporate employer for conduct carried out in the usual course of employment: Sataur v. Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017, Rule 25.06(1) requires a statement of claim to contain a concise statement of the material facts on which the party relies for its claim. E......
-
Harsch v Saskatchewan Government Insurance,
...duties cannot be sued personally for breaching a duty of care that is owed to a customer (Sataur v Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017, 140 OR (3d) [29] In order to establish the personal liability of an employee for something done in the c......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
Harsch v Saskatchewan Government Insurance,
...duties cannot be sued personally for breaching a duty of care that is owed to a customer (Sataur v Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017, 140 OR (3d) [29] In order to establish the personal liability of an employee for something done in the c......
-
Burns v. RBC Life Insurance Co., 2019 ONSC 6977
...Noble v. Riddell, [2003] O.J. No. 3053 (S.C.J.); Plante v. Industrial Alliance Life Insurance Co., [2003] O.J. No. 3034 (Master) [22] 2017 ONCA 1017. [23] Ferguson v. Peel Mutual Insurance Co., 2017 ONSC 2318; Ambrose v. Anderson, 2011 ONSC 4620 (Master); Howells v. Manufacturers Life Insur......
-
Allan Etherington v. National Hockey League, 2020 ONSC 5789
...at p. 721 [53] The plaintiff relied upon a number of cases: (a) Sataur (Litigation guardian of) v. Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017, 140 O.R. (3d) 307 which involved an established duty of care owed by employees for torts committed during the course of their employment, to their......
-
Truscott v. Co-Operators General Insurance Company,
...(1999), 43 O.R. (3d) 101 (C.A.), at p. 109, leave to appeal refused, [1999] S.C.C.A. No. 124; and Sataur v. Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017, 140 O.R. (3d) 307, at para. [103] In Sataur, the motion judge made a similar legal error to that committed in this case. The ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 17, 2023 ' April 21, 2023)
...2008 ONCA 506, ADGA Systems International Ltd. v. Valcom Ltd. (1999), 43 O.R. (3d) 101 (C.A.), Sataur v. Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017, Northbridge General Insurance Corp. v. Ashcroft Homes-Capital Hill Inc., 2021 ONSC 1684, Aviva Insurance v. Cunningham et al., 2022 ONSC 633......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (June 1 – 5, 2020)
...the employee of a corporate employer for conduct carried out in the usual course of employment: Sataur v. Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017, Rule 25.06(1) requires a statement of claim to contain a concise statement of the material facts on which the party relies for its claim. E......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 1 ' 5, 2020)
...the employee of a corporate employer for conduct carried out in the usual course of employment: Sataur v. Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017, Rule 25.06(1) requires a statement of claim to contain a concise statement of the material facts on which the party relies for its claim. E......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 18 December 22, 2017)
...characterized by the motion judge ignoring a fundamental principle of contractual interpretation. Sataur v. Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., 2017 ONCA 1017 [Laskin, Miller and Paciocco JJ.A.] Counsel: G Mackenzie, B Mackenzie and D Strelshik for the appellant B Roti, for the respondents Keywor......
Request a trial to view additional results