Coalition To Save Northern Flood v. Canada et al., (1994) 99 Man.R.(2d) 276 (QB)
Judge | Jewers, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada) |
Case Date | December 20, 1994 |
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Citations | (1994), 99 Man.R.(2d) 276 (QB) |
Save Northern Flood v. Can. (1994), 99 Man.R.(2d) 276 (QB)
MLB headnote and full text
Coalition To Save Northern Flood (plaintiff) v. Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada, Her Majesty The Queen in Right of the Province of Manitoba, The Manitoba Hydro-Electric Board, Norway House Council of the Band, Ron Evans, Fred Clarke, Kenneth McKay, Larson Anderson, James Dixon and Mike Muswagon (defendants)
(Suit No. CI 94-01-85616)
Indexed As: Coalition To Save Northern Flood v. Canada et al.
Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench
Jewers, J.
December 20, 1994.
Summary:
The Coalition to Save Northern Flood sued for a temporary and permanent injunction restraining the Norway House Council of the Band from negotiating the implementation of the Northern Flood Agreement with the Manitoba Hydro-Electric Board and the federal and provincial government. The Coalition also sought a declaration that the Council and its members had not been designated to represent the Norway House First Nation in the negotiations. The Council and its members moved to dismiss the claim against them. Manitoba Hydro moved to dismiss the claim against it.
The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench dismissed the claim against Council, Council members and Manitoba Hydro.
Courts - Topic 4021
Federal Court of Canada - Jurisdiction - Trial Division - Relief against federal boards, commissions or tribunals - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench refused to grant injunctive and declaratory relief against an Indian Band Council - The court stated that an Indian Band Council was a federal board and only the Federal Court had jurisdiction.
Courts - Topic 4034
Federal Court of Canada - Jurisdiction - Trial Division - Prerogative relief, injunctions, etc. - [See Courts - Topic 4021 ].
Indians, Inuit and Métis - Topic 6221
Government of Indians - Band councils - General - [See Courts - Topic 4021 ].
Indians, Inuit and Métis - Topic 6265
Government of Indians - What laws govern - Federal law - [See Courts - Topic 4021 ].
Practice - Topic 2230
Pleadings - Striking out pleadings - Grounds - Failure to disclose a cause of action - The Coalition to Save Northern Flood sued for a temporary and permanent injunction restraining the Norway House Council of the Band from negotiating the implementation of the Northern Flood Agreement with the Manitoba Hydro-Electric Board and the federal and provincial government - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench dismissed the claim against Manitoba Hydro-Electric Board, where the statement of claim did not allege any breaches of either common law or statutory duties on the part of Manitoba Hydro-Electric Board.
Cases Noticed:
Gabriel v. Canatonquin, [1981] 4 C.N.L.R. 61 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 5].
Chapman et al. v. Chicago et al. (1991), 52 O.A.C. 308; 5 O.R.(3d) 220 (Div. Ct.), refd to. [para. 5].
Statutes Noticed:
Federal Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, sect. 18 [para. 3].
Counsel:
M.T. O'Neill, for the plaintiff;
C. Henderson, for Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada;
G.E. Hannon, for Her Majesty The Queen in Right of the Province of Manitoba;
R.D. Bettner, for the Manitoba Hydro-Electric Board;
P. Anderson, for Norway House Council of the Band, Ron Evans, Fred Clarke, Kenneth McKay, Larson Anderson, James Dixon and Mike Muswagon.
This motion was heard before Jewers, J., of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, who delivered judgment on December 20, 1994.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Coalition To Save Northern Flood v. Canada et al., (1995) 106 Man.R.(2d) 28 (QB)
...claim against them. Manitoba Hydro moved to dismiss the claim against it. The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, in a decision reported 99 Man.R.(2d) 276, held, inter alia, that the Indian Band Council was a federal board and only the Federal Court had jurisdiction. The court dismissed the cl......
-
Coalition To Save Northern Flood v. Canada et al., (1995) 102 Man.R.(2d) 223 (CA)
...claim against them. Manitoba Hydro moved to dismiss the claim against it. The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, in a decision reported 99 Man.R.(2d) 276, held, inter alia, that the Indian Band Council was a federal board and only the Federal Court had jurisdiction. The court dismissed the cl......
-
Coalition To Save Northern Flood v. Canada et al., (1995) 106 Man.R.(2d) 28 (QB)
...claim against them. Manitoba Hydro moved to dismiss the claim against it. The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, in a decision reported 99 Man.R.(2d) 276, held, inter alia, that the Indian Band Council was a federal board and only the Federal Court had jurisdiction. The court dismissed the cl......
-
Coalition To Save Northern Flood v. Canada et al., (1995) 102 Man.R.(2d) 223 (CA)
...claim against them. Manitoba Hydro moved to dismiss the claim against it. The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, in a decision reported 99 Man.R.(2d) 276, held, inter alia, that the Indian Band Council was a federal board and only the Federal Court had jurisdiction. The court dismissed the cl......