Sechelt Golf & Country Club Ltd. v. Sechelt (District), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1105

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeAbrioux, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterEQUITY,CONTRACTS,ESTOPPEL,PRACTICE
Citation[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1105,2012 BCSC 1105,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1105 (SC)
Date24 July 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 practice notes
  • Durling et al. v. Sunrise Propane Energy Group Inc. et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 6570
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 20 Noviembre 2012
    ...Sons, 1984) at p. 763) [178] Tenancy by estoppel was recognized in Canada Sechelt Golf & Country Club Ltd v. District of Sechelt , 2012 BCSC 1105, [2012] B.C.J. No. 1559. In this case the petitioner tenant sought a declaration that his lease was still in force and effect. The respondent......
  • International Sausage House Ltd. v. Hammer Estate et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1155 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 3 Julio 2015
    ...There are no such circumstances here. [158] I was referred as well to Sechelt Golf & Country Club Ltd. v. District of Sechelt , 2012 BCSC 1105. However, in that case there was a finding of fact by Mr. Justice Abrioux that "a review of the dealings between the parties from 1991 onwards d......
  • Airside Event Spaces Inc. v. The Township of Langley, 2021 BCCA 90
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 1 Marzo 2021
    ...The judge applied the following factors, summarized in Sechelt Golf & Country Club Ltd v. District of Sechelt, 2012 BCSC 1105 at para. 139, to inform his analysis in exercising his discretion under s. 24 of the Law and Equity Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 253 to grant relief fro......
  • Peninsula (Kingsway) Seafood Restaurant Inc. v. Central Park Developments Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 7 Enero 2021
    ...damages, compensations, and all other matters that the court thinks fit. [4] Sechelt Golf & Country Club Ltd. v. District of Sechelt, 2012 BCSC 1105 at paras. 138 and 139, sets out factors to be applied and considered in deciding whether the party in default ought to be granted relief f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
  • Durling et al. v. Sunrise Propane Energy Group Inc. et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 6570
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 20 Noviembre 2012
    ...Sons, 1984) at p. 763) [178] Tenancy by estoppel was recognized in Canada Sechelt Golf & Country Club Ltd v. District of Sechelt , 2012 BCSC 1105, [2012] B.C.J. No. 1559. In this case the petitioner tenant sought a declaration that his lease was still in force and effect. The respondent......
  • International Sausage House Ltd. v. Hammer Estate et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1155 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 3 Julio 2015
    ...There are no such circumstances here. [158] I was referred as well to Sechelt Golf & Country Club Ltd. v. District of Sechelt , 2012 BCSC 1105. However, in that case there was a finding of fact by Mr. Justice Abrioux that "a review of the dealings between the parties from 1991 onwards d......
  • Airside Event Spaces Inc. v. The Township of Langley, 2021 BCCA 90
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 1 Marzo 2021
    ...The judge applied the following factors, summarized in Sechelt Golf & Country Club Ltd v. District of Sechelt, 2012 BCSC 1105 at para. 139, to inform his analysis in exercising his discretion under s. 24 of the Law and Equity Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 253 to grant relief fro......
  • Peninsula (Kingsway) Seafood Restaurant Inc. v. Central Park Developments Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 7 Enero 2021
    ...damages, compensations, and all other matters that the court thinks fit. [4] Sechelt Golf & Country Club Ltd. v. District of Sechelt, 2012 BCSC 1105 at paras. 138 and 139, sets out factors to be applied and considered in deciding whether the party in default ought to be granted relief f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT