Securities Comm. v. Future Solar Dev., [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 385 (DC)

JudgePattillo, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateMay 05, 2015
JurisdictionOntario
Citations[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 385 (DC);[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 385;2015 ONSC 2334
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 15 ' 19, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 22, 2021
    ...Serious Issue to be Tried, Securities Act , R.S.O., 1990, c. S.5, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 21.01(3)(d), OSC v. Future Solar, 2015 ONSC 2334, Future Solar Developments Inc. et al., 2016 ONSEC 17 , Future Solar Developments Inc. et al., 2015 ONSEC 25 , Qin v. Ontario Securities Commi......
  • Party A v. British Columbia (Securities Commission),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 1, 2021
    ...Ontario Securities Commission then obtain court approval of the freeze order, on notice to the affected parties. In OSC v. Future Solar, 2015 ONSC 2334, the court considered the test to be applied by a court in continuing a freeze order pursuant to s. 126(5.1) of the Ontario Securitie......
  • Qin v. Ontario Securities Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • March 18, 2021
    ...related companies under s. 127 of the Act. In May 2015, Pattillo J., directed that the freeze order should continue: OSC v. Future Solar, 2015 ONSC 2334. In May 2016, a panel of the OSC dismissed the allegations against the appellants and directed the freeze order lifted forthwith: Future S......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Clarifies That The Test To Continue A Freeze Order Under The Ontario Securities Act Has A Lower Standard Than The Test For Reasonable And Probable Cause.
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 2, 2021
    ...the freeze order passed the judicial check in s. 126 of the Securities Act on a motion to continue. Footnotes 1. OSC v Future Solar, 2015 ONSC 2334. 2. The Court of Appeal held that although Dow J. referred to abuse of process, on the facts of the case, there was no basis apart from issue......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Party A v. British Columbia (Securities Commission),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 1, 2021
    ...Ontario Securities Commission then obtain court approval of the freeze order, on notice to the affected parties. In OSC v. Future Solar, 2015 ONSC 2334, the court considered the test to be applied by a court in continuing a freeze order pursuant to s. 126(5.1) of the Ontario Securitie......
  • Qin v. Ontario Securities Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • March 18, 2021
    ...related companies under s. 127 of the Act. In May 2015, Pattillo J., directed that the freeze order should continue: OSC v. Future Solar, 2015 ONSC 2334. In May 2016, a panel of the OSC dismissed the allegations against the appellants and directed the freeze order lifted forthwith: Future S......
  • Ontario Securities Commission v. Saini,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 4, 2022
    ...The test for the “reasonable and expedient” standard is set out in OSC v. Future Solar, 2015 ONSC 2334, at para. 31. Future Solar was upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Qin v. Ontario Securities Commission, 2021 ONCA 165 . The test, as set out by Justice Pattillo in Fut......
4 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT