Segat v. Segat, [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 7 (CA)
| Judge | Weiler, Sharpe and Blair, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Case Date | January 09, 2015 |
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Citations | [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 7 (CA);2015 ONCA 16;[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 7 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...253 (QB)..........................................................................................................186, 294 Segat v Segat, 2015 ONCA 16.............................................................................................................................446, 523 Seguin ......
-
Table of cases
...253 (QB) ......................................................................................................... 176, 278 Segat v Segat, 2015 ONCA 16 ........................................................................................................................... 426, 492 Seguin......
-
Effect, registration, and enforcement of child support orders
...of matrimonial home and cancellation of maintenance registration on title pursuant to s 183 of Alberta Land Titles Act); Segat v Segat, 2015 ONCA 16; Jones v Jones, [2001] SJ No 199 (QB). Compare Plimmer v Burke, 2019 ONSC 1915 and see text to footnotes 167–69, below in this chapter. 164 Pe......
-
Form and Types of Order
...BCJ No 766 (SC) (lump sum for two years; periodic support thereafter); KAL v KJL, 2017 BCSC 651; GKD v CSD, 2021 BCSC 367; Segat v Segat, 2015 ONCA 16; Studzinski v 2020 ONSC 2540. 125 Finlay v Finlay, 2004 NBQB 138. 126 Alexander v Alexander, [1999] OJ No 3694 (SCJ). Form and Types of Orde......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Daciuk v. Daciuk,
...he has the ability to pay lump sum support other than out of the equity in the Home. [112] In Segat v. Segat, 2015 ONCA 16, the Court of Appeal for Ontario was faced with circumstances very similar to those in this case. The payor refused to offer disclosure, failed......
-
Sun v. Quan,
...83, 84 and 90. [40] R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3, s. 5(1). [41] S.O. 2002, c.24 Sched. B. 40 2007 ONCA 427, 86 O.R. (3d) 587, at para. 21. [43] 2015 ONCA 16, at para. [44] The father effectively requests a second trial on the equalization issue. [45] Serra v. Serra, 2009 ONCA 395. [46] Mattina v. Ma......
-
Smith v. Davies,
...$32,053, finding that the lump sum support awarded was not outside the range of what was appropriate. [145] Similarly, in Segat v. Segat, 2015 ONCA 16, the Ontario Court of Appeal reversed a Superior Court decision declining to award lump sum child support, finding that a lump sum award was......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 12-16, 2015)
...indemnity costs of $7,500 to the respondent, and the remainder of the respondent's costs would be paid by the estate. Segat v. Segat, 2015 ONCA 16 [Weiler, Sharpe and Blair John J. Cardill, for the appellant No one appearing for the respondent ENDORSEMENT Keywords: Family Law, Financial Dis......
6 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...253 (QB)..........................................................................................................186, 294 Segat v Segat, 2015 ONCA 16.............................................................................................................................446, 523 Seguin ......
-
Table of cases
...253 (QB) ......................................................................................................... 176, 278 Segat v Segat, 2015 ONCA 16 ........................................................................................................................... 426, 492 Seguin......
-
Effect, registration, and enforcement of child support orders
...of matrimonial home and cancellation of maintenance registration on title pursuant to s 183 of Alberta Land Titles Act); Segat v Segat, 2015 ONCA 16; Jones v Jones, [2001] SJ No 199 (QB). Compare Plimmer v Burke, 2019 ONSC 1915 and see text to footnotes 167–69, below in this chapter. 164 Pe......
-
Form and Types of Order
...BCJ No 766 (SC) (lump sum for two years; periodic support thereafter); KAL v KJL, 2017 BCSC 651; GKD v CSD, 2021 BCSC 367; Segat v Segat, 2015 ONCA 16; Studzinski v 2020 ONSC 2540. 125 Finlay v Finlay, 2004 NBQB 138. 126 Alexander v Alexander, [1999] OJ No 3694 (SCJ). Form and Types of Orde......
Request a trial to view additional results