Serban v. Serban, 2018 BCCA 166
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Bennett,The Honourable Madam Justice Stromberg-Stein,The Honourable Mr. Justice Hunter |
| Citation | 2018 BCCA 166 |
| Date | 26 April 2018 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA44189; CA44190 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
AutoCanada Capital Motors GP Inc v Mirbach,
...Court of Appeal decisions following it, where “Court’s own motion” consolidation was ordered. See also, in contrast, Serban v Serban, 2018 BCCA 166 at paras 32-36, where the BCCA rejected “Court’s own motion” consolidation where the parties did not have an opportunity to make [4] 2018 ABQB ......
-
Gupta v. Gadhri,
...justice, namely, whether the party affected by the proposed order has a fair opportunity to be heard and to respond: Serban v. Serban, 2018 BCCA 166 at [39] Like their clients, counsel acting for parties to litigation are entitled to procedural fair......
-
Singh v. Kang,
...justice, namely, whether the party affected by the proposed order has a fair opportunity to be heard and to respond: Serban v. Serban, 2018 BCCA 166 at [23] In somewhat analogous circumstances to the present ones, in the A.L.M. decision which was referred......
-
Serban v. Serban,
...consolidation before Kent J. and had not been given an opportunity to make submission on the remedy granted: Serban v. Serban, 2018 BCCA 166. The Court unwound the effect of Kent J.’s order and reinstated both the Petition and the Action. [41] &#......
4 cases
-
AutoCanada Capital Motors GP Inc v Mirbach,
...Court of Appeal decisions following it, where “Court’s own motion” consolidation was ordered. See also, in contrast, Serban v Serban, 2018 BCCA 166 at paras 32-36, where the BCCA rejected “Court’s own motion” consolidation where the parties did not have an opportunity to make [4] 2018 ABQB ......
-
Gupta v. Gadhri,
...justice, namely, whether the party affected by the proposed order has a fair opportunity to be heard and to respond: Serban v. Serban, 2018 BCCA 166 at [39] Like their clients, counsel acting for parties to litigation are entitled to procedural fair......
-
Singh v. Kang,
...justice, namely, whether the party affected by the proposed order has a fair opportunity to be heard and to respond: Serban v. Serban, 2018 BCCA 166 at [23] In somewhat analogous circumstances to the present ones, in the A.L.M. decision which was referred......
-
Serban v. Serban,
...consolidation before Kent J. and had not been given an opportunity to make submission on the remedy granted: Serban v. Serban, 2018 BCCA 166. The Court unwound the effect of Kent J.’s order and reinstated both the Petition and the Action. [41] &#......