Shaibu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 109
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2022 FC 109 |
| Date | 31 January 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Brown v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 736
...so he attempts to mount an end run around the RAD which is not allowed per Dahal. And see Shaibu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 109 [per Gleeson J] at para 8-9; Fagite v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 677 [per Pallotta J] at para 19; Xiao v Canada (Citizenshi......
-
Ndiaye v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 656
...28-29; see also Ghauri v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 548 at para 34; Shaibu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 109 at paras 6-9 [Shaibu]). [17] I therefore agree with the Minister that only arguments that were raised before the RAD can be raised before the Cou......
2 cases
-
Brown v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 736
...so he attempts to mount an end run around the RAD which is not allowed per Dahal. And see Shaibu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 109 [per Gleeson J] at para 8-9; Fagite v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 677 [per Pallotta J] at para 19; Xiao v Canada (Citizenshi......
-
Ndiaye v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 656
...28-29; see also Ghauri v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 548 at para 34; Shaibu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 109 at paras 6-9 [Shaibu]). [17] I therefore agree with the Minister that only arguments that were raised before the RAD can be raised before the Cou......