Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | Branch |
Citation | 2022 BCSC 112 |
Date | 25 January 2022 |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Docket Number | S205783 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
2024 BCSC 808,
...this treatment during the notice period, and it would have been paid absent his dismissal: Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112 at paras. 93–95; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 54 In terms of the past commission claim......
-
Cvjetkovich v Breezemax Web (Ca) Ltd,
...this treatment during the notice period, and it would have been paid absent his dismissal: Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112 at paras. 93–95; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 54 In terms of the past commission claim......
-
2023 BCSC 2408,
...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
-
Okanagan School District No. 23 v Noël,
...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
2024 BCSC 808,
...this treatment during the notice period, and it would have been paid absent his dismissal: Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112 at paras. 93–95; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 54 In terms of the past commission claim......
-
Cvjetkovich v Breezemax Web (Ca) Ltd,
...this treatment during the notice period, and it would have been paid absent his dismissal: Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112 at paras. 93–95; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 54 In terms of the past commission claim......
-
2023 BCSC 2408,
...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
-
Okanagan School District No. 23 v Noël,
...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Secret Recordings Won't Fly: BC Court Of Appeal Rules On Surreptitious Recordings By Employees In The Workplace
...confidentiality and privacy obligations to their employer. Footnotes 1. 2023 BCCA 373. 2. Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112. 3. McKinley v. BC Tel, 2001 SCC 4. See e.g., Ruder v. 1049077 Ontario Ltd., 2014 ONSC 4389. The foregoing provides only an overview and doe......