Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeBranch
Citation2022 BCSC 112
Date25 January 2022
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberS205783
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • 2023 BCSC 2408,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
  • Okanagan School District No. 23 v Noël,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 15, 2023
    ...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
  • Secret Recordings Won't Fly: BC Court Of Appeal Rules On Surreptitious Recordings By Employees In The Workplace
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 6, 2023
    ...confidentiality and privacy obligations to their employer. Footnotes 1. 2023 BCCA 373. 2. Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112. 3. McKinley v. BC Tel, 2001 SCC 4. See e.g., Ruder v. 1049077 Ontario Ltd., 2014 ONSC 4389. The foregoing provides only an overview and doe......
2 cases
  • 2023 BCSC 2408,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
  • Okanagan School District No. 23 v Noël,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 15, 2023
    ...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT