Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeBranch
Citation2022 BCSC 112
Date25 January 2022
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberS205783
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • 2024 BCSC 808,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...this treatment during the notice period, and it would have been paid absent his dismissal: Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112 at paras. 93–95; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 54 In terms of the past commission claim......
  • Cvjetkovich v Breezemax Web (Ca) Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 13, 2024
    ...this treatment during the notice period, and it would have been paid absent his dismissal: Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112 at paras. 93–95; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 54 In terms of the past commission claim......
  • 2023 BCSC 2408,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
  • Okanagan School District No. 23 v Noël,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 15, 2023
    ...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • 2024 BCSC 808,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...this treatment during the notice period, and it would have been paid absent his dismissal: Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112 at paras. 93–95; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 54 In terms of the past commission claim......
  • Cvjetkovich v Breezemax Web (Ca) Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 13, 2024
    ...this treatment during the notice period, and it would have been paid absent his dismissal: Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112 at paras. 93–95; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 54 In terms of the past commission claim......
  • 2023 BCSC 2408,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
  • Okanagan School District No. 23 v Noël,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 15, 2023
    ...of the implied undertaking rule. 50 The second point emphasised by the school board is Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, confirmed on appeal in October of this year. Shalagin does not concern the implied undertaking or Rule 23.1, and is thus of limited use to the......
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT