Shen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 620
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 620 |
| Date | 15 June 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Pan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 435
...Dhaliwal v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2015 FC 157 at paras 105–108; Shen v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 620 at paras 24–29). In this matter, the IAD discounted not only the establishment factor but also the Applicant’s expression of remorse, her comm......
-
Xia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1414
...as a factor to a level that made it impossible to overcome on an H&C analysis” (Shen v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 620 at para 29). While the misrepresentation was a relevant factor to be considered, it should not have been the only or primary factor, as this te......
-
Zou v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 368
...the two Ribic factors in the course of its Decision. As Justice Southcott observed in Shen v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 620 at paragraphs 24-27 (Shen), the IAD is not required to assess each Ribic factor separately and then conduct a tally in its concluding paragraphs (Wa......
3 cases
-
Pan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 435
...Dhaliwal v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2015 FC 157 at paras 105–108; Shen v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 620 at paras 24–29). In this matter, the IAD discounted not only the establishment factor but also the Applicant’s expression of remorse, her comm......
-
Xia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1414
...as a factor to a level that made it impossible to overcome on an H&C analysis” (Shen v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 620 at para 29). While the misrepresentation was a relevant factor to be considered, it should not have been the only or primary factor, as this te......
-
Zou v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 368
...the two Ribic factors in the course of its Decision. As Justice Southcott observed in Shen v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 620 at paragraphs 24-27 (Shen), the IAD is not required to assess each Ribic factor separately and then conduct a tally in its concluding paragraphs (Wa......