Sherstobitoff v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2019 BCSC 1659
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Fleming |
Citation | 2019 BCSC 1659 |
Date | 30 September 2019 |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Docket Number | S193818 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Campbell v. Worker's Compensation Appeal Tribunal,
...I would only add the following observation from Sherstobitoff v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2019 BCSC 1659: [52] Significantly, in applying the patent unreasonableness standard the court must examine both the reasons and the result: Air Canada v. B......
-
Chapman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal,
...fact are entitled to “utmost deference”: Sherstobitoff v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2019 BCSC 1659 at para. 51. Further, “[p]atent unreasonableness will not be established where the reviewing court considers the evidence to be insu......
-
Pavlovic v. The Owners, Strata Plan LMS 2211,
...in Sattva applies to both written and oral contracts: Sherstobitoff v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2019 BCSC 1659 at para. [55] Applying this approach, I conclude that the Contract does not oblige Just George to mainta......
-
2023 BCSC 499,
...of fact are entitled to “utmost deference”: Sherstobitoff v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2019 BCSC 1659 at para. 51. Further, “[p]atent unreasonableness will not be established where the reviewing court considers the evidence to be ins......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
Campbell v. Worker's Compensation Appeal Tribunal,
...I would only add the following observation from Sherstobitoff v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2019 BCSC 1659: [52] Significantly, in applying the patent unreasonableness standard the court must examine both the reasons and the result: Air Canada v. B......
-
Chapman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal,
...fact are entitled to “utmost deference”: Sherstobitoff v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2019 BCSC 1659 at para. 51. Further, “[p]atent unreasonableness will not be established where the reviewing court considers the evidence to be insu......
-
Pavlovic v. The Owners, Strata Plan LMS 2211,
...in Sattva applies to both written and oral contracts: Sherstobitoff v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2019 BCSC 1659 at para. [55] Applying this approach, I conclude that the Contract does not oblige Just George to mainta......
-
2023 BCSC 499,
...of fact are entitled to “utmost deference”: Sherstobitoff v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2019 BCSC 1659 at para. 51. Further, “[p]atent unreasonableness will not be established where the reviewing court considers the evidence to be ins......
Request a trial to view additional results