Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. et al. v. Ontario (Minister of Health and Long-Term Care) et al., [2013] N.R. TBEd. NO.015

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver and Wagner, JJ.
Citation[2013] N.R. TBEd. NO.015,2013 SCC 64
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date22 November 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
133 practice notes
  • Reference re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, 2020 ABCA 74
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 24 Febrero 2020
    ...made under an enactment benefit from a “presumption of validity”: see eg Katz Group Canada Inc v Ontario (Health and Long‑Term Care), 2013 SCC 64 at para 25, [2013] 3 SCR 810. The inquiry into the vires of a regulation under its enabling enactment “does not involve assessing the policy meri......
  • Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [2014] 3 SCR 31
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 2 Octubre 2014
    ...of State for the Home Department, ex p. Saleem, [2000] 4 All E.R. 814; Katz Group Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2013 SCC 64, [2013] 3 S.C.R. By Rothstein J. (dissenting) OPSEU v. Ontario (Attorney General), [1987] 2 S.C.R. 2; British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Chri......
  • Reference re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, 2021 SCC 11
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 25 Marzo 2021
    ...Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65; Katz Group Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2013 SCC 64, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 810; Roncarelli v. Duplessis, [1959] S.C.R. 121; Quebec (Attorney General) v. Canadian Owners and Pilots Association, 2010 SC......
  • International Air Transport Association v. Canadian Transportation Agency, 2022 FCA 211
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 6 Diciembre 2022
    ...in other cases the Court reverted to the vires analysis (see for example, Katz Group Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2013 SCC 64, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 810 [Katz]; Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 SCC 40, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 135 at para. 51; Donald ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
116 cases
  • Paradis Honey Ltd. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), (2015) 472 N.R. 75 (FCA)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 3 Noviembre 2014
    ...Drug Mart Inc. et al. v. Ontario (Minister of Health and Long-Term Care) et al., [2013] 3 S.C.R. 810; 451 N.R. 80; 312 O.A.C. 169; 2013 SCC 64, refd to. [para. Katz Group Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Minister of Health and Long-Term Care) - see Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. et al. v. Ontario (Minister......
  • International Air Transport Association v. Canadian Transportation Agency, 2022 FCA 211
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 6 Diciembre 2022
    ...in other cases the Court reverted to the vires analysis (see for example, Katz Group Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2013 SCC 64, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 810 [Katz]; Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 SCC 40, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 135 at para. 51; Donald ......
  • Reference re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, 2020 ABCA 74
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 24 Febrero 2020
    ...made under an enactment benefit from a “presumption of validity”: see eg Katz Group Canada Inc v Ontario (Health and Long‑Term Care), 2013 SCC 64 at para 25, [2013] 3 SCR 810. The inquiry into the vires of a regulation under its enabling enactment “does not involve assessing the policy meri......
  • Spina v. Shoppers Drug Mart Inc., 2023 ONSC 1086
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Febrero 2023
    ...Act, S.M., 2010, c. 13 ; (e) s. 3 of the Franchises Act, S.N.B. 2007, c. F-23.5; Franchises Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. F-14.1. [22] 2013 SCC 64. [23] C.R.C., c. [24] R.S.O. 1990, c. O.10. [25] R.S.O. 1990, c. P.23. [26] 2013 SCC 64 . [27] 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 14 . [28] S.O. 2006, c. 14......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 firm's commentaries
7 books & journal articles
  • Reliance on Extrinsic Aids
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Statutory Interpretation. Third Edition Analyzing the Entire Context
    • 23 Junio 2016
    ...401 at para 106 [ HL ]. 20 [2006] 1 SCR 865 at para 57. 21 See, for example, Katz Group Canada Inc v Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care) , 2013 SCC 64 at paras 30–32; Canada Trustco Mortgage Co v Canada , [2005] 2 SCR 601 at paras 15–16; Re Application under s 83.28 of the Criminal Code, [2......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Statutory Interpretation. Third Edition Preliminary Sections
    • 23 Junio 2016
    ...SJ No 719 (CA) ......................................................... 289 Katz Group Canada Inc v Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2013 SCC 64 ................................................................................................ 266 Kazemi Estate v Islamic Republic of Iran......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Regulation of Drugs in Canada. The Food and Drugs act and Related Intellectual Property Regimes - 2024 Part II
    • 22 Diciembre 2023
    ...Mart Inc v Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2011 ONCA 830, af’d (sub nom Katz Group Canada Inc v Ontario (Health and LongTerm Care)), 2013 SCC 64, [2013] 3 SCR 810 ........45, 306 Smith, Kline & French v Attorney General of Canada, [1986] 1 FC 274 .......... 190 Solvay Pharma Inc v Cana......
  • Constitutional Inconsistency in Legislation: Interpretation and the Ambiguous Role of Ambiguity.
    • Canada
    • Ottawa Law Review Vol. 48 No. 2, September 2017
    • 22 Septiembre 2017
    ...(Markham: Lexis Nexis, 2014) at 523ff [Sullivan, Sullivan on Statutes]. (5) Katz Group Canada Inc v Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2013 SCC 64 at paras 24-28, [2013] 3 SCR (6) Reference re Firearms Act (Can), 2000 SCC 31 at para 25, [2000] 1 SCR 783. (7) See Osborne v Canada (Treasury......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT