Shukriya v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1375
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | December 14, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2016 FC 1375 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Edmond v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 644
...para 14; Ramirez Martin v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 664 at para 11; Shukriya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1375 at para [19] It follows that this Court must be deferential towards the findings made by the RPD. If the outcome reached by the RPD falls wit......
-
Buyu Luemba v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 681
...of a statutory stay. This is why the threshold for such a finding is a high one”: Shukriya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1375 at paragraph 24. Indeed, when reviewing decisions of the RPD, the RAD defers to the RPD only with regard to specific categories of issues: Canada (......
2 cases
-
Edmond v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 644
...para 14; Ramirez Martin v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 664 at para 11; Shukriya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1375 at para [19] It follows that this Court must be deferential towards the findings made by the RPD. If the outcome reached by the RPD falls wit......
-
Buyu Luemba v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 681
...of a statutory stay. This is why the threshold for such a finding is a high one”: Shukriya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1375 at paragraph 24. Indeed, when reviewing decisions of the RPD, the RAD defers to the RPD only with regard to specific categories of issues: Canada (......