Sidhu v. Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeForth
Citation2022 BCSC 1024
Docket NumberM082472
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date17 June 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • 2024 BCSC 1110,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...2023 BCSC 1812 at para. 176; Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549 at para. 353; Shongu v. Jing, 2016 BCSC 901 at para. 198; Sidhu v. Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024 at paras. 760–765. However, in the present case, the same benefits were paid both before and after the 2022 BCSC 1024 at paras. 760–765. Howev......
  • Heyran v 0668403 B.C. Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 26, 2024
    ...2023 BCSC 1812 at para. 176; Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549 at para. 353; Shongu v. Jing, 2016 BCSC 901 at para. 198; Sidhu v. Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024 at paras. 760–765. However, in the present case, the same benefits were paid both before and after the 2022 BCSC 1024 at paras. 760–765. Howev......
  • 2023 BCSC 956,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...her PWD benefits. Ms. Tritton accepts that PWD benefits are deductible from past and future income loss awards (see Sidhu v Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024). 21 Counsel for Ms. Tritton calculated past wage losses assuming that she would have been earning around $35,000 and came to total of $18,547.......
  • Tritton v Lai,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 5, 2023
    ...her PWD benefits. Ms. Tritton accepts that PWD benefits are deductible from past and future income loss awards (see Sidhu v Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024). 21 Counsel for Ms. Tritton calculated past wage losses assuming that she would have been earning around $35,000 and came to total of $18,547.......
  • Get Started for Free
10 cases
  • 2024 BCSC 1110,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...2023 BCSC 1812 at para. 176; Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549 at para. 353; Shongu v. Jing, 2016 BCSC 901 at para. 198; Sidhu v. Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024 at paras. 760–765. However, in the present case, the same benefits were paid both before and after the 2022 BCSC 1024 at paras. 760–765. Howev......
  • Heyran v 0668403 B.C. Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 26, 2024
    ...2023 BCSC 1812 at para. 176; Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549 at para. 353; Shongu v. Jing, 2016 BCSC 901 at para. 198; Sidhu v. Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024 at paras. 760–765. However, in the present case, the same benefits were paid both before and after the 2022 BCSC 1024 at paras. 760–765. Howev......
  • 2023 BCSC 956,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...her PWD benefits. Ms. Tritton accepts that PWD benefits are deductible from past and future income loss awards (see Sidhu v Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024). 21 Counsel for Ms. Tritton calculated past wage losses assuming that she would have been earning around $35,000 and came to total of $18,547.......
  • Tritton v Lai,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 5, 2023
    ...her PWD benefits. Ms. Tritton accepts that PWD benefits are deductible from past and future income loss awards (see Sidhu v Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024). 21 Counsel for Ms. Tritton calculated past wage losses assuming that she would have been earning around $35,000 and came to total of $18,547.......
  • Get Started for Free