Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 179
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 179 |
| Date | 31 January 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Sun v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 710
...entitled to draw a negative inference from an applicant’s inconsistent testimony: see Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 179 [per Pentney J] at para 17, citing to Rahal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 319 [per Gleason J as she then was] at paras 41-......
-
Jayaraman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 458
...findings (Okunowo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigrations), 2020 FC 175 at para 66; Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 179 at para 19). The fact that the RAD found inconsistencies and implausibilities in the Applicant’s evidence does not mean that the SOGIE Guidelin......
2 cases
-
Sun v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 710
...entitled to draw a negative inference from an applicant’s inconsistent testimony: see Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 179 [per Pentney J] at para 17, citing to Rahal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 319 [per Gleason J as she then was] at paras 41-......
-
Jayaraman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 458
...findings (Okunowo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigrations), 2020 FC 175 at para 66; Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 179 at para 19). The fact that the RAD found inconsistencies and implausibilities in the Applicant’s evidence does not mean that the SOGIE Guidelin......