Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1211

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date07 September 2023
Citation2023 FC 1211
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Khosla v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1557
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 24, 2023
    ...which is what the Khosla family had to demonstrate to meet their burden under the IFA test (Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1211 at paras 24, [54] In other words, the RAD was responsive to the Khosla family’s concern that the Haryana police could learn their loc......
  • Belle v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1276
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 22, 2023
    ...Both prongs must be satisfied in order to make a finding that a claimant has an IFA. (Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1211 at para 18; Thirunavukkarasu v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), 1993 CanLII 3011 (FCA), [1994] 1 FC 589 (FCA) at 597-598; Hamdan v......
2 cases
  • Khosla v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1557
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 24, 2023
    ...which is what the Khosla family had to demonstrate to meet their burden under the IFA test (Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1211 at paras 24, [54] In other words, the RAD was responsive to the Khosla family’s concern that the Haryana police could learn their loc......
  • Belle v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1276
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 22, 2023
    ...Both prongs must be satisfied in order to make a finding that a claimant has an IFA. (Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1211 at para 18; Thirunavukkarasu v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), 1993 CanLII 3011 (FCA), [1994] 1 FC 589 (FCA) at 597-598; Hamdan v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT