SIR v. FLEURY, 2018 SKQB 6
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | DANYLIUK J. |
| Citation | 2018 SKQB 6 |
| Docket Number | QBG 106 of 2017 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 04 January 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Jackson v Jackson,
...a request for an adjournment, while there are many authorities that address the issue, the comments of Danyliuk J. in Sir v Fleury, 2018 SKQB 6 capture the elements involved in such a [24] The decision on an adjournment request involves an exercise of judicial discretion. While that discret......
-
McCORMACK v. PILLER,
...2022 ONCA 328 at para 11; Berger v Saskatchewan (Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority), 2019 SKCA 89 at paras 17-28; Sir v Fleury, 2018 SKQB 6 at paras 23-25; Buckle v Caswell, 2012 SKQB 143 at paras 12-14, 395 Sask R 286 [Buckle]; Markwart v Prince Albert (City), 2006 SKCA 122, 277 DLR......
2 cases
-
Jackson v Jackson,
...a request for an adjournment, while there are many authorities that address the issue, the comments of Danyliuk J. in Sir v Fleury, 2018 SKQB 6 capture the elements involved in such a [24] The decision on an adjournment request involves an exercise of judicial discretion. While that discret......
-
McCORMACK v. PILLER,
...2022 ONCA 328 at para 11; Berger v Saskatchewan (Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority), 2019 SKCA 89 at paras 17-28; Sir v Fleury, 2018 SKQB 6 at paras 23-25; Buckle v Caswell, 2012 SKQB 143 at paras 12-14, 395 Sask R 286 [Buckle]; Markwart v Prince Albert (City), 2006 SKCA 122, 277 DLR......