Sitnikova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1081

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2017 FC 1081
Date01 December 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Kadiravelupillai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 962
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 28 Junio 2022
    ...22; Esahak-Shammas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 461, at para 26; Sitnikova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1081, at paras 28-30; Jang v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2017 FC 996, at paras 31-32. [23] In the present case, the officer ac......
  • Kashyap v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 961
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 27 Junio 2022
    ...that it comes from a non-neutral source such as a family member (see, for instance, Sitnikova v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1081 at para 18). [38] The Officer’s finding is only rendered more unreasonable because the sworn statements of the Applicant and his father were cor......
  • Sanchez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 3 Diciembre 2021
    ...Applicant’s symptoms persisted or worsened, to consider implementing treatment (Sitnikova v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1081 at para 26; Jesuthasan at paras 42 – 49; Williams v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 241 at paras 23-24). [50] It may be ......
  • Sitnikova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1082
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 1 Diciembre 2017
    ...Ms. Sitnikova or her family. [23] Further, as I discuss in the companion decision Sitnikova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1081, it is clear from the jurisprudence that evidence should not be ignored solely because it comes from individuals who are connected to the person ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Kadiravelupillai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 962
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 28 Junio 2022
    ...22; Esahak-Shammas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 461, at para 26; Sitnikova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1081, at paras 28-30; Jang v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2017 FC 996, at paras 31-32. [23] In the present case, the officer ac......
  • Kashyap v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 961
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 27 Junio 2022
    ...that it comes from a non-neutral source such as a family member (see, for instance, Sitnikova v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1081 at para 18). [38] The Officer’s finding is only rendered more unreasonable because the sworn statements of the Applicant and his father were cor......
  • Sanchez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 3 Diciembre 2021
    ...Applicant’s symptoms persisted or worsened, to consider implementing treatment (Sitnikova v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1081 at para 26; Jesuthasan at paras 42 – 49; Williams v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 241 at paras 23-24). [50] It may be ......
  • Sitnikova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1082
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 1 Diciembre 2017
    ...Ms. Sitnikova or her family. [23] Further, as I discuss in the companion decision Sitnikova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1081, it is clear from the jurisprudence that evidence should not be ignored solely because it comes from individuals who are connected to the person ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT