Slawsky v Edmonton (City), 2019 ABQB 77

JudgeJ.H. Goss
Citation2019 ABQB 77
Date30 January 2019
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number1603 10195
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd. v City of Medicine Hat,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 Febrero 2022
    ...maker’s ruling:  Fitzpatrick v College of Physical Therapists of Alberta, 2019 ABCA 254 at para 28; Slawsky v Edmonton (City), 2019 ABQB 77 at para 62, aff’d 2019 ABCA 302. [12]        The standard of review with respect to the substance......
  • Lee v. Wedekind,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 24 Octubre 2022
    ...of bias unless it could be said that the decision maker has prematurely made up his mind: Slawsky v Edmonton (City), 2019 ABQB 77 at paras 106 and 119. I do not find the Majority’s comments rise to the level such that the Majority could no longer be seen......
  • Gulia v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 1 Junio 2021
    ...of bias, but may be appropriate in the context of the entire proceeding: Slawsky v. Edmonton (City) Composite Assessment Review Board, 2019 ABQB 77 at paras.107-108. [24] In this case, the Board (at paragraph 47) felt it necessary to comment on Mr. Gulia’s conduct on the basis that t......
  • Ecojustice Canada Society v Alberta,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 Mayo 2021
    ...allegation of bias raises the issue of procedural fairness and where founded results in a loss of jurisdiction. Slawsky v Edmonton (City) 2019 ABQB 77 at para 62. Here Ecojustice has failed to identify to whom a duty of fairness is owed and who has breached the duty of fairness, if one exis......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd. v City of Medicine Hat,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 Febrero 2022
    ...maker’s ruling:  Fitzpatrick v College of Physical Therapists of Alberta, 2019 ABCA 254 at para 28; Slawsky v Edmonton (City), 2019 ABQB 77 at para 62, aff’d 2019 ABCA 302. [12]        The standard of review with respect to the substance......
  • Lee v. Wedekind,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 24 Octubre 2022
    ...of bias unless it could be said that the decision maker has prematurely made up his mind: Slawsky v Edmonton (City), 2019 ABQB 77 at paras 106 and 119. I do not find the Majority’s comments rise to the level such that the Majority could no longer be seen......
  • Gulia v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 1 Junio 2021
    ...of bias, but may be appropriate in the context of the entire proceeding: Slawsky v. Edmonton (City) Composite Assessment Review Board, 2019 ABQB 77 at paras.107-108. [24] In this case, the Board (at paragraph 47) felt it necessary to comment on Mr. Gulia’s conduct on the basis that t......
  • Ecojustice Canada Society v Alberta,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 Mayo 2021
    ...allegation of bias raises the issue of procedural fairness and where founded results in a loss of jurisdiction. Slawsky v Edmonton (City) 2019 ABQB 77 at para 62. Here Ecojustice has failed to identify to whom a duty of fairness is owed and who has breached the duty of fairness, if one exis......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT