Smith v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2006 NBQB 86
Judge | Garnett, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada) |
Case Date | January 30, 2006 |
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Citations | 2006 NBQB 86;(2006), 300 N.B.R.(2d) 363 (TD) |
Smith v. Can. (A.G.) (2006), 300 N.B.R.(2d) 363 (TD);
300 R.N.-B.(2e) 363; 782 A.P.R. 363
MLB headnote and full text
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
....................
Temp. Cite: [2006] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. MR.046
Kenneth Earl Smith and Paulette Marie Delaney-Smith (plaintiffs) v. Attorney General of Canada as represented by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Timothy Joseph Quigley, Daniel Louis LeFebvre, James Jeffrey Payne, Daniel Anselm Nugent, Donald Rex Domenie, Glenn Martindale, Rene Joseph Toussaint Bertrand, Joseph Fernand Jocelyn Themens, Edward James MacEachern (defendants)
(F/C/132/04; 2006 NBQB 86)
Indexed As: Smith v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.
New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench
Trial Division
Judicial District of Fredericton
Garnett, J.
March 15, 2006.
Summary:
Smith and his wife were members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). They sued the RCMP and other members, alleging that Smith's superiors took administrative and disciplinary action against him, abused the complaint process, improperly transferred him, wrongfully promoted one of the defendants and conspired to discredit him in his trade and calling. Smith characterized this conduct as breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of statutory duty and, alternatively, as negligence. The defendants moved for a stay or dismissal of the action under rule 23.01(2)(a) on the basis that the court lacked jurisdiction to try the action.
The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, dismissed the motion and awarded $10,000 costs to the plaintiffs.
Labour Law - Topic 9076
Public service labour relations - Remedies - Civil action - When available - Smith and his wife were members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) - They sued the RCMP and other members, alleging that Smith's superiors took administrative and disciplinary action against him, abused the complaint process, improperly transferred him, wrongfully promoted one of the defendants and conspired to discredit him in his trade and calling - Smith characterized this conduct as breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of statutory duty and, alternatively, as negligence - The defendants moved for a stay or dismissal of the action on the basis that the court lacked jurisdiction to try the action - The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, dismissed the motion - The dispute described in the statement of claim "in its essential character" arose out of the employer/employee relationship - However, the internal scheme designed to address members' claims had failed repeatedly in Smith's case - Smith had lost faith in its fairness and so had the court.
Police - Topic 4077
Internal organization - Discipline of members - Grievances - [See Labour Law - Topic 9076 ].
Police - Topic 6002
Actions by police - When available - [See Labour Law - Topic 9076 ].
Cases Noticed:
St. Anne Nackawic Pulp & Paper Co. v. Canadian Paperworkers Union, Local 219, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 704; 68 N.R. 112; 73 N.B.R.(2d) 236; 184 A.P.R. 236; 28 D.L.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 59].
Weber v. Ontario Hydro, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 929; 183 N.R. 241; 82 O.A.C. 321; 125 D.L.R.(4th) 583, refd to. [para. 59].
New Brunswick v. O'Leary, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 967; 183 N.R. 229; 163 N.B.R.(2d) 97; 419 A.P.R. 97; 125 D.L.R.(4th) 609, refd to. [para. 59].
Vaughan v. Canada, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 146; 331 N.R. 64; 2005 SCC 11, refd to. [para. 59].
Phillips v. Harrison (2000), 153 Man.R.(2d) 1; 238 W.A.C. 1; 196 D.L.R.(4th) 69 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 71].
Counsel:
B. Richard Bell, Q.C., for the plaintiffs;
Martin Ward, Q.C., and Andrea Jamieson, for the defendants, Attorney General of Canada, as represented by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Timothy Joseph Quigley, Daniel Anselm Nugent, Donald Rex Domenie, Glenn Martindale, Rene Joseph Toussaint Bertrand, Joseph Fernand Jocelyn Themens, and Edward James MacEachern;
Richard Scott, Q.C., for the defendants, Daniel Louis LeFebvre and James Jeffrey Payne.
This motion was heard on January 30, 2006, by Garnett, J., of the New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, Judicial District of Fredericton, who delivered the following decision on March 15, 2006.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Vihvelin v. New Brunswick Community College et al., 2015 NBCA 17
...66, affd. (2002), 252 N.B.R.(2d) 51; 658 A.P.R. 51; 2002 NBCA 70, refd to. [para. 23]. Smith v. Canada (Attorney General) et al. (2006), 300 N.B.R.(2d) 363; 782 A.P.R. 363; 2006 NBQB 86, affd. (2007), 316 N.B.R.(2d) 180; 816 A.P.R. 180; 2007 NBCA 58, refd to. [para. 23]. Dugas v. Landry et ......
-
Sandiford v. Canada, (2007) 309 F.T.R. 233 (FC)
...Vaughan v. Canada, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 146; 331 N.R. 64; 2005 SCC 11, refd to. [para. 29]. Smith v. Canada (Attorney General) et al. (2006), 300 N.B.R.(2d) 363; 782 A.P.R. 363 (T.D.), dist. [para. Calvin Sandiford, on his own behalf; Valerie Anderson and Ward Bansley, for the defendant. Solicit......
-
Graham v. Canada, 2007 FC 210
...leave to amend. [27] Before concluding, I wish to address Ms. Graham’s reliance on Smith v. Canada (Attorney General) et al. (2006), 300 N.B.R. (2d) 363 (Q.B.T.D.) (Smith), which she urged me to follow. There, Madam Justice Garnett refused to dismiss an action initiated by members of the R.......
-
Smith v. Can. (A.G.),
...the court lacked jurisdiction to try the action. The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, in a decision reported at 300 N.B.R.(2d) 363; 782 A.P.R. 363 , dismissed the motion and awarded $10,000 costs to the plaintiffs. The defendants sought leave to appeal the decision. Th......
-
Vihvelin v. New Brunswick Community College et al., 2015 NBCA 17
...66, affd. (2002), 252 N.B.R.(2d) 51; 658 A.P.R. 51; 2002 NBCA 70, refd to. [para. 23]. Smith v. Canada (Attorney General) et al. (2006), 300 N.B.R.(2d) 363; 782 A.P.R. 363; 2006 NBQB 86, affd. (2007), 316 N.B.R.(2d) 180; 816 A.P.R. 180; 2007 NBCA 58, refd to. [para. 23]. Dugas v. Landry et ......
-
Sandiford v. Canada, (2007) 309 F.T.R. 233 (FC)
...Vaughan v. Canada, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 146; 331 N.R. 64; 2005 SCC 11, refd to. [para. 29]. Smith v. Canada (Attorney General) et al. (2006), 300 N.B.R.(2d) 363; 782 A.P.R. 363 (T.D.), dist. [para. Calvin Sandiford, on his own behalf; Valerie Anderson and Ward Bansley, for the defendant. Solicit......
-
Graham v. Canada, 2007 FC 210
...leave to amend. [27] Before concluding, I wish to address Ms. Graham’s reliance on Smith v. Canada (Attorney General) et al. (2006), 300 N.B.R. (2d) 363 (Q.B.T.D.) (Smith), which she urged me to follow. There, Madam Justice Garnett refused to dismiss an action initiated by members of the R.......
-
Smith v. Can. (A.G.),
...the court lacked jurisdiction to try the action. The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, in a decision reported at 300 N.B.R.(2d) 363; 782 A.P.R. 363 , dismissed the motion and awarded $10,000 costs to the plaintiffs. The defendants sought leave to appeal the decision. Th......