Smith v. Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario et al., 2016 ONSC 7222
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | matheson |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | TORTS,PRACTICE |
| Date | 29 November 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Smith v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 651
...an appeal from the order of Justice Wendy M. Matheson of the Superior Court of Justice, dated November 29, 2016, with reasons reported at 2016 ONSC 7222, 368 C.R.R. (2d) Tulloch J.A.: I. INTRODUCTION [1] This appeal arises from a “Mr. Big” operation that led to the plaintiff being charged w......
-
Clark v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2017 ONSC 3683
...only addressed the civil liability of Crown Attorneys to aggrieved accused persons. They cite Matheson J.’s decision in Smith v. Ontario, 2016 ONSC 7222, in which held that it was not plain and obvious that Crown Attorneys do not owe a duty of care to police regarding the provision of negli......
2 cases
-
Smith v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 651
...an appeal from the order of Justice Wendy M. Matheson of the Superior Court of Justice, dated November 29, 2016, with reasons reported at 2016 ONSC 7222, 368 C.R.R. (2d) Tulloch J.A.: I. INTRODUCTION [1] This appeal arises from a “Mr. Big” operation that led to the plaintiff being charged w......
-
Clark v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2017 ONSC 3683
...only addressed the civil liability of Crown Attorneys to aggrieved accused persons. They cite Matheson J.’s decision in Smith v. Ontario, 2016 ONSC 7222, in which held that it was not plain and obvious that Crown Attorneys do not owe a duty of care to police regarding the provision of negli......