Smooke v Rosemont Condo Corp, 2017 SKQB 201
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | DANYLIUK |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,REAL PROPERTY,COMPANY LAW |
| Citation | 2017 SKQB 201 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 05 July 2017 |
| Docket Number | QBG 97 of 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Digest: Goertz v The Owners Condominium Plan No. 98SA12401, 2018 SKCA 41
...(3d) 511 Sharpe v Condominium Plan No. 87R23752, 1998 CarswellSask 460, 81 ACWS (3d) 177 Smooke v Rosemont Estate Condo Corp. 101222494, 2017 SKQB 201, 80 RPR (5th) 277 St. Ann�s Island Shooting and Fishing Club v The King, 1950 CanLII 28, [1950] SCR 211 Westmorland County Condominium Corpo......
-
Windels v Reddekopp,
...to the same effect, Yashcheshen v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 SKCA 116 at para 78, and Smooke v Rosemont Estate Condo Corp 101222494, 2017 SKQB 201 at para 24, 80 RPR (5th) 277. In Smooke, an applicant commenced an oppression application by using a notice of application instead of an or......
-
Windels v Reddekopp,
...same effect, Yashcheshen v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 SKCA 116 at para 78, and Smooke v Rosemont Estate Condo Corp 101222494, 2017 SKQB 201 at para 24, 80 RPR (5th) 277. In Smooke, an applicant commenced an oppression application by using a notice of application instead of an......
-
WILCHUK v. WESTFIELD TWINS CONDO CORPORATION, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, 2018 SKQB 2
...should have been brought before the court by way of originating application in form 3-49: Smooke v Rosemont Estate Condo Corp 101222494, 2017 SKQB 201 [Smooke]. However, the Corporation waives any irregularity in the Board’s Authority to Act [14] A condominium corporation must act and exerc......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Windels v Reddekopp,
...to the same effect, Yashcheshen v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 SKCA 116 at para 78, and Smooke v Rosemont Estate Condo Corp 101222494, 2017 SKQB 201 at para 24, 80 RPR (5th) 277. In Smooke, an applicant commenced an oppression application by using a notice of application instead of an or......
-
Windels v Reddekopp,
...same effect, Yashcheshen v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 SKCA 116 at para 78, and Smooke v Rosemont Estate Condo Corp 101222494, 2017 SKQB 201 at para 24, 80 RPR (5th) 277. In Smooke, an applicant commenced an oppression application by using a notice of application instead of an......
-
WILCHUK v. WESTFIELD TWINS CONDO CORPORATION, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, 2018 SKQB 2
...should have been brought before the court by way of originating application in form 3-49: Smooke v Rosemont Estate Condo Corp 101222494, 2017 SKQB 201 [Smooke]. However, the Corporation waives any irregularity in the Board’s Authority to Act [14] A condominium corporation must act and exerc......
-
Goertz v The Owners Condominium Plan No. 98SA12401, 2018 SKCA 41
...cited as reasons to appoint an administrator inform a decision under s. 101: see also Smooke v Rosemont Estate Condo Corp 101222494, 2017 SKQB 201, 80 RPR (5th) [164] In British Columbia, the parallel Strata Property Act, SBC 1998, c 43, provision allows for an order to be made if it “is in......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Goertz v The Owners Condominium Plan No. 98SA12401, 2018 SKCA 41
...(3d) 511 Sharpe v Condominium Plan No. 87R23752, 1998 CarswellSask 460, 81 ACWS (3d) 177 Smooke v Rosemont Estate Condo Corp. 101222494, 2017 SKQB 201, 80 RPR (5th) 277 St. Ann�s Island Shooting and Fishing Club v The King, 1950 CanLII 28, [1950] SCR 211 Westmorland County Condominium Corpo......