SOISETH v. HILL
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Judge | F.N. TURCOTTE J. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SKQB 109 |
| Citation | 2021 SKQB 109 |
| Date | 09 April 2021 |
| Docket Number | DIV 336 of 2015; QBG 706 of 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
A.C. Forestry Ltd. v Big River First Nation
...v Welch, 2019 SKQB 62; Pavement Scientific International Inc. v Saskatoon (City), 2019 SKQB 254, 4 CLR (5th) 208; and Soiseth v Hill, 2021 SKQB 109. The Court of King’s Bench appears to have granted partial judgment rarely, but as the Ontario Court of Appeal observed in Service Mold, “parti......
-
LEIER v. LEIER
...law proceeding at any time after the close of the pleadings but before the time and place for trial have been set. [4] In Soiseth v Hill, 2021 SKQB 109 [Soiseth], Turcotte J. tackled a summary judgment application and considered the process to be followed as prescribed by Holmes v Jastek Ma......
-
MULLER v. JENSEN (ESTATE)
...both current and historical. The question is what authority exists for bifurcating the trial at this stage. [11] In Soiseth v Hill, 2021 SKQB 109, Turcotte J. was called upon to consider a summary judgment application respecting the validity of an interspousal contract which would impact th......
4 cases
-
Anderson v Anderson
...the technical requirements set out in that section and is not “unconscionable or grossly unfair” pursuant to s. 24: Soiseth v Hill, 2021 SKQB 109 at para 62. That is, to bypass the statutory regime governing the division of family property, the agreement must be one that satisfies the follo......
-
A.C. Forestry Ltd. v Big River First Nation
...v Welch, 2019 SKQB 62; Pavement Scientific International Inc. v Saskatoon (City), 2019 SKQB 254, 4 CLR (5th) 208; and Soiseth v Hill, 2021 SKQB 109. The Court of King’s Bench appears to have granted partial judgment rarely, but as the Ontario Court of Appeal observed in Service Mold, “parti......
-
LEIER v. LEIER
...law proceeding at any time after the close of the pleadings but before the time and place for trial have been set. [4] In Soiseth v Hill, 2021 SKQB 109 [Soiseth], Turcotte J. tackled a summary judgment application and considered the process to be followed as prescribed by Holmes v Jastek Ma......
-
MULLER v. JENSEN (ESTATE)
...both current and historical. The question is what authority exists for bifurcating the trial at this stage. [11] In Soiseth v Hill, 2021 SKQB 109, Turcotte J. was called upon to consider a summary judgment application respecting the validity of an interspousal contract which would impact th......
