Soltaninejad v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1343

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2022 FC 1343
Date29 September 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Zibadel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 285
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 1 Marzo 2023
    ...Torkestani v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2022 FC 1469, at para 5; Soltaninejad v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1343, at para 4. [37] In Ekpenyong v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2019 FC 1245, Justice Pamel recognised that it is permissib......
  • Nouri v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1240
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 14 Septiembre 2023
    ...same or similar language were also found to be unreasonable recently by this Court in Soltaninejad v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1343 at paras 4, 19–23 and Torkestani v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1469 at paras [8] The Minister argues Ms. Tabrizi N......
  • Hassanpour v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1738
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 15 Diciembre 2022
    ...this case. In so concluding, I adopt the reasoning of Mr. Justice William Pentney in Soltaninejad v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1343 at paras 14-15, which involved a similar fact situation. Justice Pentney concluded that it was not a reversible error for the officer to fai......
  • Torkestani v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2022 FC 1469
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 27 Octubre 2022
    ...is identical to that found in the recent decision of Justice Pentney in Soltaninejad v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1343. I have underlined the points of overlap in the following identical passages: I have reviewed the application. Although the tuition has been ......
4 cases
  • Zibadel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 285
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 1 Marzo 2023
    ...Torkestani v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2022 FC 1469, at para 5; Soltaninejad v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1343, at para 4. [37] In Ekpenyong v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2019 FC 1245, Justice Pamel recognised that it is permissib......
  • Nouri v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1240
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 14 Septiembre 2023
    ...same or similar language were also found to be unreasonable recently by this Court in Soltaninejad v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1343 at paras 4, 19–23 and Torkestani v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1469 at paras [8] The Minister argues Ms. Tabrizi N......
  • Hassanpour v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1738
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 15 Diciembre 2022
    ...this case. In so concluding, I adopt the reasoning of Mr. Justice William Pentney in Soltaninejad v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1343 at paras 14-15, which involved a similar fact situation. Justice Pentney concluded that it was not a reversible error for the officer to fai......
  • Torkestani v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2022 FC 1469
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 27 Octubre 2022
    ...is identical to that found in the recent decision of Justice Pentney in Soltaninejad v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1343. I have underlined the points of overlap in the following identical passages: I have reviewed the application. Although the tuition has been ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT