Spadacini-Kelava v. Kelava
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Kurz J. |
| Neutral Citation | 2020 ONSC 7907 |
| Docket Number | 15/37882 |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 7907 |
| Date | 17 December 2020 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 19 ' 23, 2023)
...CanLII 34620 (Ont. C.A.), Garland v. Consumers' Gas Co., 2004 SCC 25, Cowper-Smith v. Morgan, 2017 SCC 61, Spadacini-Kelava v. Kelava, 2020 ONSC 7907, Scholz v. Scholz, 2013 BCCA 309, Korman v. Korman, 2015 ONCA 578. Zhao v. Xiao, 2023 ONCA 453 Keywords: Family Law, Child Support, Section 7......
-
Todd v Bayer Inc.
...7158 at paras 43–49, Christakos v De Caires, 2016 ONSC 702 at paras 56–57 and, in the arbitration context, Spadacini-Kelava v Kelava, 2020 ONSC 7907 at para 176. 55 A certification hearing conducted on a paper record is a poor way to evaluate expert evidence. The approach to determining the......
-
Bogue v Miracle
...of issues which have already been decided in the proceedings between the parties. 43 As Kurz J. explained in Spadacini-Kelava v. Kelava, 2020 ONSC 7907, at para. 106(10): Issue estoppel can even apply to interlocutory orders in the same proceeding. In Earley-Kendall v. Sirard, 2007 ONCA 468......
-
Lucas-Logan v Certas et Al
...decision must have been final; and c. the parties to both proceedings must be the same. 55 Our court in Spadacini-Kelava v. Kelava, 2020 ONSC 7907, at para. 106, helpfully summarized several of the key principles governing issue estoppel, as 1. The issue out of which the estoppel is said to......
3 cases
-
Todd v Bayer Inc.,
...7158 at paras 43–49, Christakos v De Caires, 2016 ONSC 702 at paras 56–57 and, in the arbitration context, Spadacini-Kelava v Kelava, 2020 ONSC 7907 at para 176. 55 A certification hearing conducted on a paper record is a poor way to evaluate expert evidence. The approach to determining the......
-
Bogue v Miracle,
...of issues which have already been decided in the proceedings between the parties. 43 As Kurz J. explained in Spadacini-Kelava v. Kelava, 2020 ONSC 7907, at para. 106(10): Issue estoppel can even apply to interlocutory orders in the same proceeding. In Earley-Kendall v. Sirard, 2007 ONCA 468......
-
Lucas-Logan v Certas et Al,
...decision must have been final; and c. the parties to both proceedings must be the same. 55 Our court in Spadacini-Kelava v. Kelava, 2020 ONSC 7907, at para. 106, helpfully summarized several of the key principles governing issue estoppel, as 1. The issue out of which the estoppel is said to......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 19 ' 23, 2023)
...CanLII 34620 (Ont. C.A.), Garland v. Consumers' Gas Co., 2004 SCC 25, Cowper-Smith v. Morgan, 2017 SCC 61, Spadacini-Kelava v. Kelava, 2020 ONSC 7907, Scholz v. Scholz, 2013 BCCA 309, Korman v. Korman, 2015 ONCA 578. Zhao v. Xiao, 2023 ONCA 453 Keywords: Family Law, Child Support, Section 7......