Spencer v. Hussey
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Norell |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 631 |
| Docket Number | M186994 |
| Date | 27 April 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Dugas v. Kebede
...Sirak v. Noonward, 2015 BCSC 274; b) Jafferi v. Hardcastle, 2018 BCSC 486; and c) Spencer v. Hussey, 2020 BCSC 631. [122] The defence submits that a range of $30,000 to $40,000 is more appropriate, citing Chapman v. Zilm, 2020 BCSC......
-
Steenhuisen v. Francis
...The plaintiff seeks $130,000 to $150,000 in non-pecuniary damages, relying on Xu v. Balaski, 2020 BCSC 940 ($145,000); Spencer v. Hussey, 2020 BCSC 631 ($130,000); and Jafferi v. Hardcastle, 2018 BCSC 486 ($150,000). Mr. Steenhuisen argues that in these cases, the plaintiffs also had p......
-
Akhtarkhavari v. Griffith
...per year and this is the gross amount that should have been stated in paragraph 177 of the Trial Reasons: Spencer v. Hussey, 2020 BCSC 631 at para. [7] Therefore, after applying the actuarial multiplier to age 65, the t......
3 cases
-
Dugas v. Kebede
...Sirak v. Noonward, 2015 BCSC 274; b) Jafferi v. Hardcastle, 2018 BCSC 486; and c) Spencer v. Hussey, 2020 BCSC 631. [122] The defence submits that a range of $30,000 to $40,000 is more appropriate, citing Chapman v. Zilm, 2020 BCSC......
-
Steenhuisen v. Francis
...The plaintiff seeks $130,000 to $150,000 in non-pecuniary damages, relying on Xu v. Balaski, 2020 BCSC 940 ($145,000); Spencer v. Hussey, 2020 BCSC 631 ($130,000); and Jafferi v. Hardcastle, 2018 BCSC 486 ($150,000). Mr. Steenhuisen argues that in these cases, the plaintiffs also had p......
-
Akhtarkhavari v. Griffith
...per year and this is the gross amount that should have been stated in paragraph 177 of the Trial Reasons: Spencer v. Hussey, 2020 BCSC 631 at para. [7] Therefore, after applying the actuarial multiplier to age 65, the t......
