Springfield Capital Inc. v Grande Prairie (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2018 ABCA 203
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter |
| Docket Number | 1803-0016-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 25 May 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Windy Field Ltd v Cardston (County),
...development permits with or without conditions: Springfield Capital Inc v Grande Prairie (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2018 ABCA 203 at para 20. In such cases, it can be necessary for the decision maker to explain to the appeal tribunal why it made its decision. The concern ab......
-
Gates v Standard (Village),
...its proper role. [39] The applicant, relying on Springfield Capital Inc v Grande Prairie (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2018 ABCA 203, argues that the Development Authority exceeded its proper role by advocating for a particular result at the hearing. Further, the applicant sub......
-
2023 ABCA 1,
...development permits with or without conditions: Springfield Capital Inc v Grande Prairie (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2018 ABCA 203 at para 20. In such cases, it can be necessary for the decision maker to explain to the appeal tribunal why it made its decision. The concern ab......
-
Windy Field Ltd v Cardston (County),
...development permits with or without conditions: Springfield Capital Inc v Grande Prairie (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2018 ABCA 203 at para 20. In such cases, it can be necessary for the decision maker to explain to the appeal tribunal why it made its decision. The concern ab......
4 cases
-
Windy Field Ltd v Cardston (County),
...development permits with or without conditions: Springfield Capital Inc v Grande Prairie (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2018 ABCA 203 at para 20. In such cases, it can be necessary for the decision maker to explain to the appeal tribunal why it made its decision. The concern ab......
-
Gates v Standard (Village),
...its proper role. [39] The applicant, relying on Springfield Capital Inc v Grande Prairie (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2018 ABCA 203, argues that the Development Authority exceeded its proper role by advocating for a particular result at the hearing. Further, the applicant sub......
-
2023 ABCA 1,
...development permits with or without conditions: Springfield Capital Inc v Grande Prairie (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2018 ABCA 203 at para 20. In such cases, it can be necessary for the decision maker to explain to the appeal tribunal why it made its decision. The concern ab......
-
Windy Field Ltd v Cardston (County),
...development permits with or without conditions: Springfield Capital Inc v Grande Prairie (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2018 ABCA 203 at para 20. In such cases, it can be necessary for the decision maker to explain to the appeal tribunal why it made its decision. The concern ab......