Stacey Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 55
| Judge | Ottenbreit, Schwann and Kalmakoff JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Case Date | May 01, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Citations | 2020 SKCA 55 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Khaleel v Indar,
...the injury would not have occurred but for the negligence of Dr. Indar: LR v Semenjuk, 2021 ABCA 318 at para 27; Stacy Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 55. 206 The Supreme Court, in Snell v Farrell, provides guidance on how the but for test should be applied in medical malpractice cases. It is......
-
Hander v Kumar,
...injury, or if it contributed in some not insubstantial or immaterial way to the injury the plaintiff sustained (Stacey Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 55 at para 78, [2020] 8 WWR 668; Donleavy v Ultramar, 2019 ONCA 687 at para 72, 60 CCLT (4th) [41] A......
-
Geran v Geran Estate,
...Altus Group Limited v Estevan (City), 2021 SKCA 101 at para 34, 23 MPLR (6th) 9 [Altus Group], and Stacey Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 55 at para 32, [2020] 8 WWR 668, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2020 CanLII 97865. [89] &#x......
-
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1400 v. P&H MILLING GROUP A DIVISION OF PARRISH & HEIMBECKER, LIMITED SASKATOON,
...“sick”, I have benefited from the closer‑to‑home analysis of the Court of Appeal in Stacey Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 55, [2020] 8 WWR 668 [Stacey 2]. That case was an appeal from my decision in Stacey Estate v Lukenchuk, 2019 SKQB 41, [2019] 6 WWR 496 [S......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Khaleel v Indar,
...the injury would not have occurred but for the negligence of Dr. Indar: LR v Semenjuk, 2021 ABCA 318 at para 27; Stacy Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 55. 206 The Supreme Court, in Snell v Farrell, provides guidance on how the but for test should be applied in medical malpractice cases. It is......
-
Hander v Kumar,
...injury, or if it contributed in some not insubstantial or immaterial way to the injury the plaintiff sustained (Stacey Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 55 at para 78, [2020] 8 WWR 668; Donleavy v Ultramar, 2019 ONCA 687 at para 72, 60 CCLT (4th) [41] A......
-
Geran v Geran Estate,
...Altus Group Limited v Estevan (City), 2021 SKCA 101 at para 34, 23 MPLR (6th) 9 [Altus Group], and Stacey Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 55 at para 32, [2020] 8 WWR 668, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2020 CanLII 97865. [89] &#x......
-
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1400 v. P&H MILLING GROUP A DIVISION OF PARRISH & HEIMBECKER, LIMITED SASKATOON,
...“sick”, I have benefited from the closer‑to‑home analysis of the Court of Appeal in Stacey Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 55, [2020] 8 WWR 668 [Stacey 2]. That case was an appeal from my decision in Stacey Estate v Lukenchuk, 2019 SKQB 41, [2019] 6 WWR 496 [S......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Case Summary: Stacey Estate v Lukenchuk
...contributed to the death. The "but for" test for causation is applicable for this and medical negligence cases. Stacey Estate v Lukenchuk, 2020 SKCA 55,per Kalmakoff, Facts + Issues This decision is an appeal of a Chambers decision relating to the bringing of an action under the Fatal Accid......