Stalzer (Estate) v Stalzer, 2019 ABQB 658

JudgeHonourable Madam Justice A. Loparco
Docket Number4803 143744
Citation2019 ABQB 658
Date02 March 2020
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Esfahani v Samimi,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 5, 2022
    ...to do so considering the factors set out in section 8: Hodgson v Hodgson, 2005 ABCA 13 at paras 19-21; Stalzer (Estate) v Stalzer, 2019 ABQB 658 at para 18; O’Kane v Lillqvist-O’Kane, 2022 ABKB 661 at para [173]       If the $18,500 originally pai......
  • Kuzuchar v Kuzuchar,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 8, 2023
    ...of finality, courts may decide to “do the best they can” with the evidence they have:  Stalzer (Estate) v Stalzer, 2019 ABQB 658 at para 61; Ross v Ross, 2007 ABQB 167 at paras 60-61; Van Oirschot v Van Oirschot, 2010 ABQB 211 at paras 88-89; White v White, 2022 ABQB 322 ......
  • O'Kane v Lillqvist-O'Kane,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 4, 2022
    ...property. The Court of Appeal’s four-step approach was summarized as follows by Justice Loparco in Stalzer (Estate) v Stalzer, 2019 ABQB 658 at para 1.       Determine all property owned at the date of trial; 2.       &......
  • Pensions Newsletter – October 2019
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 5, 2019
    ...value of Mr. Hronowsky's pension for the purposes of calculating his NFP. Ontario Superior Court Decision Stalzer (Estate) v. Stalzer, 2019 ABQB 658 Frank and Elizabeth Stalzer (Parties) separated in 2006, but they did not resolve the property issues arising from their separation before Mr.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Esfahani v Samimi,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 5, 2022
    ...to do so considering the factors set out in section 8: Hodgson v Hodgson, 2005 ABCA 13 at paras 19-21; Stalzer (Estate) v Stalzer, 2019 ABQB 658 at para 18; O’Kane v Lillqvist-O’Kane, 2022 ABKB 661 at para [173]       If the $18,500 originally pai......
  • Kuzuchar v Kuzuchar,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 8, 2023
    ...of finality, courts may decide to “do the best they can” with the evidence they have:  Stalzer (Estate) v Stalzer, 2019 ABQB 658 at para 61; Ross v Ross, 2007 ABQB 167 at paras 60-61; Van Oirschot v Van Oirschot, 2010 ABQB 211 at paras 88-89; White v White, 2022 ABQB 322 ......
  • O'Kane v Lillqvist-O'Kane,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 4, 2022
    ...property. The Court of Appeal’s four-step approach was summarized as follows by Justice Loparco in Stalzer (Estate) v Stalzer, 2019 ABQB 658 at para 1.       Determine all property owned at the date of trial; 2.       &......
2 firm's commentaries
  • Pensions Newsletter – October 2019
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 5, 2019
    ...value of Mr. Hronowsky's pension for the purposes of calculating his NFP. Ontario Superior Court Decision Stalzer (Estate) v. Stalzer, 2019 ABQB 658 Frank and Elizabeth Stalzer (Parties) separated in 2006, but they did not resolve the property issues arising from their separation before Mr.......
  • Pensions Newsletter – October 2019
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • October 24, 2019
    ...and is not intended to be legal advice. IN THIS ISSUE FAMILY LAW Van Delst v. Hronowsky, 2019 ONSC 2569 Stalzer (Estate) v. Stalzer, 2019 ABQB 658 EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS FOR UNIONIZED EMPLOYEES Norfolk General Hospital v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1, 2019 CanLII 81794 (......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT