Stambuski v. Stambuski, 2018 MBQB 141

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeTHOMSON
Citation2018 MBQB 141
Docket NumberFD 13-01-05703
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
Date28 August 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...opportunities.210 As in the context of child support,211 so too in the context 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 also Stambuski v Stambuski, 2018 MBQB 141 (imputing corporate income; capital cost allowance). Compare Nixon v Lumsden, 2020 ONSC 147 at paras Cited in KK v MM, 2021 ONSC 7522 at para ......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 August 2020
    ...to retire when a spouse is acting in bad faith,” i.e., “only when it 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 See also Stambuski v Stambuski, 2018 MBQB 141 (imputing corporate income; capital cost allowance). Compare Nixon v Lumsden, 2020 ONSC 147 at paras 157–58. Durfey v Durfey, 2017 ABCA 166 ......
  • Friesen v Friesen, 2020 ABQB 103
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 10 February 2020
    ...purposes. See for example: Mancini v Phelan, 2012 ABQB 536 at para 196; Oliver v Oliver, 2018 ONSC 712 at para 83; Stambuski v Stambuski, 2018 MBQB 141 – Appendix IV; and Curry v Curry, 2016 ONSC 1893 at para [141] The total amount due for the period March 1, 2005 to February 29, 2012 is $6......
  • Wyndels v. Minuk, 2019 MBQB 96
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 27 June 2019
    ...confirmed that there is no general rule and each case is decided on its own merits. Justice Thomson confirmed in Stambuski v. Stambuski, 2018 MBQB 141, that the onus is on the self-employed parent seeking to deduct the CCA to prove that the expense is reasonable. If the parent seeking to ma......
2 cases
  • Friesen v Friesen, 2020 ABQB 103
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 10 February 2020
    ...purposes. See for example: Mancini v Phelan, 2012 ABQB 536 at para 196; Oliver v Oliver, 2018 ONSC 712 at para 83; Stambuski v Stambuski, 2018 MBQB 141 – Appendix IV; and Curry v Curry, 2016 ONSC 1893 at para [141] The total amount due for the period March 1, 2005 to February 29, 2012 is $6......
  • Wyndels v. Minuk, 2019 MBQB 96
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 27 June 2019
    ...confirmed that there is no general rule and each case is decided on its own merits. Justice Thomson confirmed in Stambuski v. Stambuski, 2018 MBQB 141, that the onus is on the self-employed parent seeking to deduct the CCA to prove that the expense is reasonable. If the parent seeking to ma......
2 books & journal articles
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...opportunities.210 As in the context of child support,211 so too in the context 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 also Stambuski v Stambuski, 2018 MBQB 141 (imputing corporate income; capital cost allowance). Compare Nixon v Lumsden, 2020 ONSC 147 at paras Cited in KK v MM, 2021 ONSC 7522 at para ......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 August 2020
    ...to retire when a spouse is acting in bad faith,” i.e., “only when it 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 See also Stambuski v Stambuski, 2018 MBQB 141 (imputing corporate income; capital cost allowance). Compare Nixon v Lumsden, 2020 ONSC 147 at paras 157–58. Durfey v Durfey, 2017 ABCA 166 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT