Stefanska v. Chyzynski, 2020 ONSC 3048

JudgeC. HORKINS J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateMay 15, 2020
JurisdictionOntario
Citations2020 ONSC 3048
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Stefanska v. Chyzynski, 2020 ONSC 3570
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 8 Junio 2020
    ...) ) HEARD at Toronto: June 5 2020 Addendum to Reasons for judgment C. hORKINS J. [1] In Reasons for Judgment released May 15, 2020 (2020 ONSC 3048), the father’s application for an order directing return of the children under the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduct......
  • M.K. v. F.J.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 Agosto 2022
    ...para 280; Balev at para 159.  To do otherwise would seriously undermine the purpose of the Hague Convention; Stefanska v. Chyzynski, 2020 ONSC 3048 at para 79, citing C.L.M. v. J.E.A., 2002 NSCA 127 at para 42.  I add that R.J.’s purported concerns or preferences ......
  • CB v BM, 2021 ABQB 151
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 Febrero 2021
    ...is to be very narrowly construed so as not to compromise the underlying objectives of the Hague Convention: Stefanska v Chyzynski, 2020 ONSC 3048.  [85]        The exception for “grave risk” must not turn into an assessment of the parent......
3 cases
  • Stefanska v. Chyzynski, 2020 ONSC 3570
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 8 Junio 2020
    ...) ) HEARD at Toronto: June 5 2020 Addendum to Reasons for judgment C. hORKINS J. [1] In Reasons for Judgment released May 15, 2020 (2020 ONSC 3048), the father’s application for an order directing return of the children under the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduct......
  • M.K. v. F.J.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 Agosto 2022
    ...para 280; Balev at para 159.  To do otherwise would seriously undermine the purpose of the Hague Convention; Stefanska v. Chyzynski, 2020 ONSC 3048 at para 79, citing C.L.M. v. J.E.A., 2002 NSCA 127 at para 42.  I add that R.J.’s purported concerns or preferences ......
  • CB v BM, 2021 ABQB 151
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 Febrero 2021
    ...is to be very narrowly construed so as not to compromise the underlying objectives of the Hague Convention: Stefanska v Chyzynski, 2020 ONSC 3048.  [85]        The exception for “grave risk” must not turn into an assessment of the parent......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Views Of The Child ' Should I Get A Voice Of The Child Report?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 29 Agosto 2023
    ...6. See Svirsky v Svirsky, 2013 ONSC 5564 at para 27 and Religa v Nesrallah, 2017 ONSC 1491 at paras 16-18. 7. Stefanska v Chyzynski, 2020 ONSC 3048. 8. Ibid at para 9. See Byers, supra note 3 at para 25, where Justice Tellier ordered a VOC for a six-year old child. 10. In Medjuck v Medjuck,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT