C.S. v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 1268

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Watchuk
Docket NumberS149482
Citation2017 BCSC 1268
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PRACTICE,EVIDENCE
Date21 July 2017
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 practice notes
  • Byelkova v. Fraser Health Authority,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 16, 2021
    ...considered all of the evidence and argument, even if not all are recited in the reasons: CS v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 1268 at para 219, aff’d 2018 BCCA 264, leave to appeal ref’d 2019 CanLii [21]        On an appl......
  • Stein v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal), 2020 BCSC 1431
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 25, 2020
    ...for judicial review alleging bias and unfairness, which review was dismissed by the BC Supreme Court (C.S. v. BC (Human Rights Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 1268). An appeal was taken and that appeal was also unsuccessful: Stein v. BC. (Human Rights Tribunal), 2018 BCCA 264). Finally the Supreme Cou......
  • Murphy v. Vancouver Island Health Authority, 2017 BCSC 2255
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 8, 2017
    ...is the same: patent unreasonableness.[117] According to this Court's decision in Stein v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 1268, such is not the case. Rather, the first and second of these decisions is subject to a standard of patent unreasonableness. Declining to order d......
  • Hunt v. Highview Estates Mobile Home Park,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 1, 2022
    ...and arguments before them, even if they do not refer to them all in their decision: C.S. v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 1268 at para. 219. [72]        Fifth, there is no reason that a standard term cannot also be considered a materi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
  • Byelkova v. Fraser Health Authority,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 16, 2021
    ...considered all of the evidence and argument, even if not all are recited in the reasons: CS v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 1268 at para 219, aff’d 2018 BCCA 264, leave to appeal ref’d 2019 CanLii [21]        On an appl......
  • Stein v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal), 2020 BCSC 1431
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 25, 2020
    ...for judicial review alleging bias and unfairness, which review was dismissed by the BC Supreme Court (C.S. v. BC (Human Rights Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 1268). An appeal was taken and that appeal was also unsuccessful: Stein v. BC. (Human Rights Tribunal), 2018 BCCA 264). Finally the Supreme Cou......
  • Murphy v. Vancouver Island Health Authority, 2017 BCSC 2255
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 8, 2017
    ...is the same: patent unreasonableness.[117] According to this Court's decision in Stein v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 1268, such is not the case. Rather, the first and second of these decisions is subject to a standard of patent unreasonableness. Declining to order d......
  • Hunt v. Highview Estates Mobile Home Park,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 1, 2022
    ...and arguments before them, even if they do not refer to them all in their decision: C.S. v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal), 2017 BCSC 1268 at para. 219. [72]        Fifth, there is no reason that a standard term cannot also be considered a materi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT