Stemmler v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1299

CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateNovember 24, 2016
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2016 FC 1299
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Terms and Conditions of Employment of Federal Public Servants
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Labour and Employment Law in the Federal Public Service - Second Edition Part III
    • 27 Febrero 2024
    ...253 . 39 Sandiford v Canada (Attorney General) , 2009 FC 862 ; Byer v Canada , 2002 FCT 518 ; and Stemmler v Canada (Attorney General) , 2016 FC 1299. 388 | LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW IN THE FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE department to issue the policy, whether the policy is precise, whether it ......
  • Kreutzweiser v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 46
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 17 Enero 2018
    ...CDS’ specialized expertise in CAF grievances should be afforded significant deference. See Stemmler v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1299 at para 30 [Stemmler]; Walsh v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FCA 157 at para 14. The Respondent accepts, however, that questions of proced......
  • Innes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1717
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 14 Diciembre 2022
    ...specialized expertise of the FA: Birks v Canada (Attorney General), 2010 FC 1018 at para 4; Stemmler v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1299 at para 30; Bond-Castelli v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 1155 at para 31. Indeed, the Court has remitted matters for redetermination before de......
  • Filizola v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 7 Diciembre 2021
    ...notes that this Court has applied the reasonableness standard to previous decisions of the CDS (see: Stemmler v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1299; Higgins v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 32 at para 77), and submits that post-Vavilov, the standard of reasonableness for decisions o......
3 cases
  • Kreutzweiser v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 46
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 17 Enero 2018
    ...CDS’ specialized expertise in CAF grievances should be afforded significant deference. See Stemmler v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1299 at para 30 [Stemmler]; Walsh v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FCA 157 at para 14. The Respondent accepts, however, that questions of proced......
  • Innes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1717
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 14 Diciembre 2022
    ...specialized expertise of the FA: Birks v Canada (Attorney General), 2010 FC 1018 at para 4; Stemmler v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1299 at para 30; Bond-Castelli v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 1155 at para 31. Indeed, the Court has remitted matters for redetermination before de......
  • Filizola v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 7 Diciembre 2021
    ...notes that this Court has applied the reasonableness standard to previous decisions of the CDS (see: Stemmler v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1299; Higgins v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 32 at para 77), and submits that post-Vavilov, the standard of reasonableness for decisions o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT