Strickland et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2015] N.R. TBEd. JL.001
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, C.J.C., Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Côté, JJ. |
| Subject Matter | CONSTITUTIONAL LAW,PRACTICE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,COURTS |
| Citation | [2015] N.R. TBEd. JL.001,2015 SCC 37,386 DLR (4th) 1,[2015] SCJ No 37 (QL),[2015] ACS no 37,[2015] 2 SCR 713 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 09 July 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
Ghazi v. Canada (National Revenue), 2019 FC 860
...not be sought when there are alternative remedies available. [45] The Supreme Court of Canada in Strickland v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 37reviewed when an adequate alternative remedy would be appropriate grounds to strike an application for judicial review. The Supreme Court state......
1 cases
-
Ghazi v. Canada (National Revenue), 2019 FC 860
...not be sought when there are alternative remedies available. [45] The Supreme Court of Canada in Strickland v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 37reviewed when an adequate alternative remedy would be appropriate grounds to strike an application for judicial review. The Supreme Court state......