Stukanov v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1264

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 1264
Date13 December 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Stukanov v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 49
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 13, 2021
    ...to refuse his patent application filed in 2012. Mr. Stukanov’s statutory appeal was dismissed: Stukanov v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1264. The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal: Stukanov v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FCA 278 . Mr. Stukanov sought reconsideration of t......
  • Stukanov v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FCA 278
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • November 7, 2019
    ...REASONS FOR JUDGMENT LOCKE J.A. [1] This is an appeal by Igor Stukanov from a decision of Mr. Justice Fothergill of the Federal Court (2018 FC 1264), dated December 13, 2018 which dismissed an earlier appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents (the Commissioner) refusing Mr. Stuk......
  • Stukanov v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1421
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 18, 2022
    ...an appeal in relation to a rejection of a patent for a “Universal External Drive.” [43] In his Stukanov v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1264 [Stukanov 2], Mr. Stukanov advanced three types of arguments: a) substantive arguments that the Commissioner of Patents was incorrect, leading to......
  • Corning Cable Systems LLC v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1065
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 9, 2019
    ...identified the correct legal test is a question of law reviewable on a correctness standard (Stukanov v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1264 at para 8 [Stukanov]; Blair v Canada (Attorney General), 2010 FC 227 at paras 48-51 [Blair 2010]). In this regard, if the Commissioner mischaracter......
4 cases
  • Stukanov v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 49
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 13, 2021
    ...to refuse his patent application filed in 2012. Mr. Stukanov’s statutory appeal was dismissed: Stukanov v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1264. The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal: Stukanov v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FCA 278 . Mr. Stukanov sought reconsideration of t......
  • Stukanov v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FCA 278
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • November 7, 2019
    ...REASONS FOR JUDGMENT LOCKE J.A. [1] This is an appeal by Igor Stukanov from a decision of Mr. Justice Fothergill of the Federal Court (2018 FC 1264), dated December 13, 2018 which dismissed an earlier appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents (the Commissioner) refusing Mr. Stuk......
  • Stukanov v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1421
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 18, 2022
    ...an appeal in relation to a rejection of a patent for a “Universal External Drive.” [43] In his Stukanov v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1264 [Stukanov 2], Mr. Stukanov advanced three types of arguments: a) substantive arguments that the Commissioner of Patents was incorrect, leading to......
  • Corning Cable Systems LLC v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1065
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 9, 2019
    ...identified the correct legal test is a question of law reviewable on a correctness standard (Stukanov v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1264 at para 8 [Stukanov]; Blair v Canada (Attorney General), 2010 FC 227 at paras 48-51 [Blair 2010]). In this regard, if the Commissioner mischaracter......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT